Sunday, August 14, 2005 8:14 PM
3rd & 5th leads
PITBULLS:
Over the years there I has been a tug of war between
4th best leads vrs 3rd and 5th. Experts have
argued which lead convention is better. The latest consensus among experts at
the national level is that they both are !
3rd and 5th best lead are best against suit contracts and 4th best against NT contracts.
In suit contracts , it is important to know that partners low card lead is 3rd
or 5th for cash out purposes and switches and planning your defense.
It is less important in suit contracts that you “burn spot cards” by leading your 2nd lowest card
to show 4 of the suit.
In
NT when you waste spot cards on your opening lead with 4 of them , it can often
be fatal. Also the rule of 11 in NT contracts is invaluable in knowing what is going on with the suit. Bryan
Maksysmetz knew that I played 4th best with Tom and 3rd
& 5th with BJ. Therefore he suggested that we should be a switch
hitter in this regard. He says most top
level players alternate between suit and NT contracts with 3rd
and 5th best leads. I can see the advantages now that I play both lead conventions with my two
regular partners.
Playing
3rd and 5th best with BJ has opened my eyes on the
importance of differentiating between 3 to an honour lead as opposed to 4 of an
honour. With standard 4th best you can not tell the difference which
can be fatal in suit contracts.
In NT contracts 3 card suits are hardly ever lead except when demanded by the
bidding so partner can normally work it out anyway from the distribution given by the bidding..
Some
more hints I got from Maksymetz in discussing players defensive cardings at the
national level. Foster echoes are only useful
in NT contracts. In suit contracts , if you can not beat dummys card
, Bryan suggests suit preference rather than count. Its obviously not attitude
when you can not beat dummys honour card ( Ace & King excluded ) so he
feels suit preference is more useful than count in suit contracts only.
Bryan
has strong opinions on “coded 9’s &
10’s”. He says they give too much information on the opening lead
but use them during the middle of the hand
helps the defense more than declarer. During the middle of the hand it is more
important to show whether you have a real interior sequence switch. Anyway
theses are just his opinions. Any
comments ?