Tuesday, May 18, 2004
2:38 AM
Hand Evaluation – Doubles as Q Bids
PITBULLS:
As
anybody who follows the Bridge World Master Solvers Club knows, panelists
always seem to Q bid when they have a good hand & do not know what to
do. Playing D.S.I.P. theory , you have the luxury of using a double as a Q bid ! D.S.I.P. theory replaces Q bids to
describe the same hand types as
these panelists were trying to do. You double to convey the same message of
showing a good hand but you do not
know what to do. The double is
far more flexible , as a Q bid
could rescue bad bidding
opponents.
The way we play our Q bids after an opening bid or an overcall is fit showing , so Q bids show limit raise or
better values. Since we do not know if the Q bid is the “better” , these Q bids do not turn on forcing passes. If the level of the Q bid is at
the game level or forcing to the game level when
you are vul or equal vul , forcing passes are turned on. Same idea
with splinters. Splinters are fit showing limit raises or better. If splinters are bid at the game
level vul or equal , forcing
passes are on. Auctions in general where bids force
to game vul or equal
vulnerability , turn on forcing
passes . Auctions that invite to
game do not. More leeway is
allowed when you are not vul
against vul ( terrorist ) as tactics enter into the equation.
D.S.I.P. doubles quite often replace Q bids , so the thinking should be exactly the same as if a Q bid was made..
O.K.
why the review of forcing passes ?
This is important because by default in all auctions where forcing passes do not
apply , D.S.I.P. theory
does apply. Trump
stack doubles are only allowed in rare auctions like when the opponents balance
or converting other types of
doubles or pre-empts. Playing with Tom , I held ♠AKx ♥Kxx ♦J10xxx ♣xx , the auction went
1♦-1♥-p-2♦
3♣-P-P-? . I could just bid
3♥ now but that violates D.S.I.P. theory. What if Tom
had clubs ? He is not allowed to
double as that shows a 3♥ bid with
defense . He could have a ridiculous hand like ♠xx ♥Q10xxx ♦x ♣AKQJx so by you bidding 3♥ you rescued them from a disaster. A double also describes your hand as a defensive hand with only 3 card support
instead of an offensive hand with
4 card so partner can compete accordingly. If Tom bid 3♥ over 3♣ he is just being a nuisance as “free bids”
do not apply when you have a D.S.I.P. double at your disposal.
Do
not forget that you have obligations after
you Q bid to describe you hand & leave partner options. Say you had ♠Axxx ♥KQx ♦KQxx ♣xx ,
the auction went
1♥-2♣-3♣-P
3♥-4♣-? You
should double saying you have a 4♥ bid with
defense. Partners hand is ♠Kx ♥AJxxx ♦Jx ♣QJ10x so 4♣ x goes
for a huge number. A D.S.I.P. double can be thought of as a re-Q bid with defense.
Do
not let a void deter you from
making a D.S.I.P. double. You Q bid
with a void so you can make a D.S.I.P. double with a void as the intended meaning is the same as the Q bid. Tom Gandolfo had ♠void ♥AJxx ♦Axx ♣AKJxxx & they opened 1♠ everybody vul. This is a T/O
double as you have the other major , quick tricks & are strong enough to
bid 3♣ over partners bid. Say you do overcall 2♣, they bid 2♠ with partner bidding 3♣ & they bidding 3♠.
You would like to Q bid as you
have 8 tricks in NT or a possible club slam. You do not want to bypass 3NT with
your Q bid as you are jammed by the rank of the spade suit. You double instead
& partner bids 3NT. This makes for +630 & 5♣ fails by one trick.
D.S.I.P.
theory demands that you know when
forcing pass theory applies with Q bids
so you are keenly aware of the vulnerability.
You can catch the opponents speeding from either
side of the table instead of rescuing
them by bidding from one side. D.S.I.P. theory also describes your hand for
sacrificing or for avoiding pseudo sacrifices. Trump stack doubles are
virtually extinct in competitive
auctions !! When you remove
something as basic as
trump stack doubles from
your system you need many treatments to compensate. D.S.I.P. theory
has to be studied and understood.
This is a non standard concept so only recommended for expert partnerships.