Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:48 AM
D.S.I.P. Serious Intent
PITBULLS:
Meckwell
came up with something called the “serious 3NT” . The bid means that one side
has “serious” slam interest as opposed to Q bidding as a courtesy in case partner
had slam interest. D.S.I.P. doubles in competition have similar “serious”
intent. If partner just bids , no inferences can be taken from the fact that
she bid again or bid again “freely” . There is no
game try intended and in fact the bid may be an advance sacrifice
against their game or partial. Partner is not
expected to bid again based on partners actions.
We
have the above understanding because of the meaning assigned to the D.S.I.P. double in competition. D.S.I.P.
doubles are competitive doubles
defined by removing the “trump
stack” element from the double. The double says I “seriously” want to compete
again and I have defensive tricks.
Based on my double you can convert
, compete again or even bid game. I am not just competing , I
am very serious about it. The double is a very versatile bid in Bridge . It
leaves the most options open.
Using the double as a trump stack in competition puts a useful bid in a “straight jacket”. How many
times when the opponents are supporting each other’s suit vigorously do you have a trump stack in their suit ? Wasting a bid for that remote eventuality
is just poor Bridge judgment.
In
the event you do have a trump stack in their suit , you can use the negative
double concept of a pass. Partner
with controls in line with his competitive bid must re-open with a double. The penalty conversion now takes
place. What if partner does not have enough to double ? Taking your plus can
not be bad. With duplication of value you can not make anything your way
anyway. It is not Match Points where it is important to double because +200
beats +140. You do not have to take those risks in IMPS. D.S.I.P.
theory is IMPS orientated. The more I think about it , trump stack
doubles are a match point & rubber bridge tool to punish bad bidders. In
IMPS , quite often we do not want to take the chance of locating trump for a
good declarer. Why not redefine the penalty double
for IMPS ?
Variability
of overcalls , opening bids , takeout doubles needs one more bid in the Bridge
vocabulary to show extra defense in the nature of controls. Reserve
the double to describe that situation in competition and not the trump stack. The trump stack in
competition is shown by the “green card” . A pass after competing should be a
“red light” for the partnership . It either means I am too weak to even compete
again or I have their suit.
Partner must as a courtesy ask
permission to compete again with a D.S.I.P. double.
Quite
a few penalty doubles rescue opponents from bad spots or help them play the
hand with the bad trump breaks. Converting partners D.S.I.P. guarantees that
the “partnership”
has enough to beat the contract. A trump stack double is one of the most single
handed actions in Bridge. Do not pull my penalty doubles because I know what is
best for the partnership. Not the partner I would like to have in high level
Bridge. A penalty double is supposed to warn partner not to compete again as I
have their suit. A pass does the job better.
You have one more option with that bid and that is to also pass. Once you
have doubled and partner does not like it , it is too late as she may get
doubled in her contract. Duplication of value in their suit guarantees that our
contract will not play very well. This is the competitive advantage of D.S.I.P.
double theory.
Bridge is
played in a “clockwise” direction which makes the penalty double concept in Bridge useless in some competitive auctions. You have a nice juicy
trump stack double in their suit
and you are competing in your suit.
Before you get a chance to double , partner rescues them by competing again. You can not double out of
turn but you would like to. How about if partner wants to compete again he must
do so with a double if he had
defense ? This is happiness as he has let you in on the competitive decision.
D.S.I.P. double theory makes a lot of sense.