Saturday, March 04, 2006 5:40 AM
D.S.I.P.
- History
PITBULLS:
I
am finding articles on the net that shows Kokish was the first to suggest
“D.S.I.P. doubles” . I took it a step further and made them more structured and
added more concepts. The work that Tom , BJ , Stan & I did on them is
original research. I must concede
that Kokish thought of the idea before I did. I just did not know about it.
Also this author suggested the name Do Something Intelligent Partner before
Gordon Campbell did ( maybe Gordon read this article on the net ) . Action
doubles are a narrow subset of D.S.I.P. doubles which I call 3rd
case D.S.I.P. doubles where the opponents own
the hand and you want to ask permission to sacrifice after
pre-empting.
Action Doubles
In the dim and distant days
when I learned to play bridge, my mentors impressed deeply on my memory that
once you had made a pre-emptive bid of any type, you kept quiet for the rest of
the auction.
This seemed to be a fairly widely held view. After all, you had
probably bid about two tricks more than your hand was worth when you made the
pre-empt.
A couple of years ago, I noticed that auctions like this were
becoming more commonplace.
NORTH |
ME |
SOUTH |
MY PARTNER |
2 Spades (weak) |
3 Hearts |
3 Spades |
4 Hearts |
4 Spades ! |
double |
all pass |
|
I would not have minded, but the opponents always seemed to get a
good score from this apparently irrational bidding.
Lets look at an example from the other viewpoint. I held this hand
at favourable vulnerability during the teams event at Brighton.
ªJ ©J4 ¨T76 §AQT8643.
I opened three clubs ( all right, I know that a red-blooded male
would have opened five clubs ). Next hand doubles, partner bids four clubs and
next hand bids four spades. What do you do now? Should we sell out? If so
should we double? Perhaps we have a cheap sacrifice?
In reality, with this hand you want to bid five clubs but have a
nagging worry that partner just bid 4 clubs to up the ante prior to doubling
them. Some pairs play that 3NT by partner (instead of four clubs) encourages a
sacrifice but it is not always certain which contract the opponents will reach.
The answer, playing ACTION
DOUBLES, is to double. This means please bid on - unless you know
better. Here, partner will normally bid five clubs but with a suitable hand
will pass the double for penalties.
Basically, an action double
says to partner "I don't want to pass; do something intelligent" (some hope with most partners!) They are fundamentally a blame-shifting device, allowing the doubler
to place the blame squarely on partner for whatever goes wrong thereafter.
Could there be a more appealing scenario?
Eric Kokish the brilliant Canadian player and
writer, calls them "One for the Road Doubles" and provides this
example.
As South at love all, You hold ªAQJ82 ©874 ¨AQ8 §J2
The bidding proceeds:
EAST |
SOUTH |
WEST |
NORTH |
1 Diamond |
1 Spade |
Double (t.o) |
3 Spades (pre-emptive) |
Pass |
Pass |
4 Hearts |
Pass |
Pass |
?? |
|
|
Normally, it would be bad bridge to bid four spades now (having
previously passed three) since it gives the opponents two bites of the cherry.
Besides, sometimes West will have done the wrong thing in bidding four hearts.
South has a difficult decision since the hand is potentially useful in both offence and defence. Total number
of tricks (TNT) fans will note that South is likely to gain by some further
action (but that is another article).
The answer once again is to make an ACTION DOUBLE, asking partner to choose.
Lets look at two possible full hand layouts:
(1)
|
ª 10 7 6 3 |
|
ª K 9 5 |
|
ª 4 |
|
ª A Q J 8 2 |
|
(2)
|
ª K 7 6 3 |
|
ª 10 9 5 |
|
ª 4 |
|
ª A Q J 8 2 |
|
With layout 1, North has an excellent hand for defence and a
diamond lead will net +300. With this hand, North will pass the action double. In fact, four spades would
have probably gone one down in layout one, emphasising the importance of not
making the wrong "busy" decision .With
hand 2, North has little interest in defending and will remove the action double to four spades. This is a
very cheap sacrifice against the cold game.
There are
numerous opportunities to use these sorts of double on competitive deals. Exactly how and when
you use them must be defined by partnership
agreement.