Sunday, March 09, 2003 3:12 AM
Exclusion Blackwood - 4 level
PITBULLS:
Exclusion Blackwood is an excellent bidding tool . When splinters were first invented
, the idea was that a jump to the 3 level shows a singleton and at the 4 level
a void . Exclusion Blackwood has made the void showing splinter extinct in my opinion. Why tell partner and
the opponents you have a void when you have a tool that ignores her duplication
of value in that suit ? When you
are showing a void its for slam purposes anyway , so taking control via Exclusion Blackwood makes a lot more sense
to me.
Established
partnerships should play that all void showing jumps either at the 5 level or lower is Exclusion Blackwood . Tom and I
had an auction last Thursday night . I held
A |
x |
v |
A |
K |
x |
o |
10 |
J |
|
i |
9 |
x |
|
d |
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I opened a spade and Tom
surprised me by bidding 2♣ . A 3♠
bid by me is close but it shows a solid or semi solid suit . I chose to bid 4♦ which is an obvious void in diamonds. Tom took it as
Exclusion Blackwood and he ignored his AK of diamonds in his response .
Although he had 19 HCP we stayed out of 7 as we were off the king of clubs .
Tom had a stiff spade so we were missing 5 spades to the queen which makes a
grand in spades not very likely . 6♣ won us 7 IMPS .
I
think direct 4 level splinters should be
extinct in favour of Exclusion
Blackwood . If it is clear that partner is showing a void , it is
Exclusion Blackwood .
Partner
opens a diamond and you have
v |
A |
A |
K |
o |
K |
x |
x |
i |
J |
x |
x |
d |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
this hand . You
respond a heart and hear partner rebids her diamonds. Exclusion Blackwood is not 5♠
but 4♠ . Three
spades is a singleton & 4 spades is a void so why waste a level ? You are past 3NT and having partner bid
4NT over your 4♠ void showing bid seems kind of weak . Have your void showing bid always be Exclusion
Blackwood and you save a level . If the auction is
complicated , jumping to the 5 level certainly is Exclusion Blackwood and can
not be misinterpreted . With minors as
trump , jumps at the 4 level in a major is Exclusion Blackwood.
Scientists
might want to have all 3 bids available . 1♠
3/4/5 ♦ being a singleton , a void and then Exclusion
Blackwood . The 4♦ bid would invite slam only if partner has no
duplication of value in diamonds . I do not
buy into that treatment. The first two steps in Exclusion Blackwood
could still keep you under game and why
broadcast a void if you do not have serious slam interests ? If you are that weak , treat your void
as a singleton and just splinter at the 3 level. You might be able to re Q bid
later to indicate a void. A splinter would be defined as a singleton or void at
the 3 level , if you do not have serious slam aspirations. 1♥/♠-P-4♣/♦ is Exclusion Blackwood so there is no need to
go to the 5 level.
Your
partner opens 1♠
and you hold x x xx KQJ109xxxx . You
can now leap to 5♣ and it is not Exclusion
Blackwood but a plethora of clubs . 4♣ would be Exclusion Blackwood in support of spades if you do not play
“flower bids” . If you chose to
bid 1NT with this freak and partner bids 3♥ , 4♣ is a Q bid and 5♣ is not Exclusion Blackwood as you did not bid 4♣ going in - ergo
you must have clubs .
Comments ?