Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:12 PM
Forcing Pass - 2/1
PITBULLS:
Sometimes the opponents enter your game forcing auctions
2/1 , Jacoby 2NT , Inverted minors , forcing 2♣ etc. Forcing pass theory should
apply in all these auctions. If
the fit is advertised like inverted minors or Jacoby 2NT the pass and double
and pass & pull all have the standard
forcing pass understandings. What if we do not have an advertised
fit as in a 2/1 ? Forcing pass theory still applies obviously but the rules are
different. A pass just means you do not have a fit with partner and you are
going to respect her decision if she wields the axe. If you now pull the
double, this is the “pass & pull” slam try. Supporting partner directly
should show a minimum raise. Simple stuff.
Qxxx AKJ10x xx Ax , Qxxx
AKJ10x x Q10x , Qxxx AKJ10x x
AKx . Lets
try these hands after you open 1♥ with
partner bidding 2♣ and RHO bidding 2♦. With the first hand I pass and wait to hear what
partner has to say. She may bid spades , support hearts or double. If it is the
latter , that is where they play this hand. The 2ND hand I just bid 3♣ since I am not leaving
the double of 2♦ in as I have too many clubs and will destroy
partners defense. The 3rd hand I pass 2♦ but for a different reason. I plan to pull the
double to 3♣ as a slam try.
What
about game forcing auctions where you may have relays or Jacoby like responses
? Some people have special
understandings that a double took my bid
away or it means I have a bid in a suit ranking lower than their suit
otherwise you just make your systemic bid and ignore their bid. Too much science even for yours truly. I prefer to play
everything off except for forcing pass theory
if they enter our game forcing auctions. Our inverted minors are a special
case. They can be fit showing or a
balanced hand. The double should
be systemic to identify the balanced hand and a bid shows the minor fit. With
Jacoby 2NT , standard fit showing forcing pass theory applies rather than
science.
1♠-P-2NT-3♦ ? forcing pass theory says you pass with
shortness in diamonds and a willingness for offensive action. A double shows
diamonds or warning partner that you may have quick diamond losers. A Q bid in
a suit should imply a diamond control as you failed to double. Bidding your
trump suit should show a minimum but shortness
in diamonds as you did not double. When the opponents enter your forcing
auctions, milk them for the maximum amount of information you can give partner.
Always remember that they are allowed to play the contract doubled ( Steve
Williard & Osama ) . Comments
and/or suggestions ?