From: Bob
Crosby [mailto:bobcrosby@shaw.ca]
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 5:33
AM
To: Tom Gandolfo; BJ
Trelford; Susan Culham; Kiz Fung; Perry khakar
Subject: Forcing Passes - One over One
Response
Friday, March 10, 2006
8:09 AM
Forcing Pass - One
over One Response
PITBULLS:
More on Forcing Passes
from notes Eric Kokish sent me. One common thread with these articles is what
happens when forcing pass theory does not
apply. Kokish plays “transferable values” doubles or D.S.I.P. when forcing pass theory does
not apply. In other words , forcing passes defines when D.S.I.P. doubles are
applicable.
AFTER
A ONE-OVER-ONE RESPONSE
(1)
Opener invites game and responder
accepts. Forcing pass in effect.
(2)
Responder invites game and opener
accepts. Forcing pass in effect.
(3)
Opener invites game and responder does
not accept. No forcing pass.
(4)
Responder invites game and opener does
not accept. No Forcing Pass.
(5)
A cue-bid by opener creates forcing
pass.
(6)
Opener raises to game or jump raises to
game after a weak jump overcall. Forcing passes are in
effect
only by opener, VUL vs NONVUL (so says Kantar).
According
to EOK:
The
vulnerability does not matter; what is important is the NATURE OF THE RAISE. If
it is
defined
as HCP, passes are forcing; if it is defined as distributional and tightly
limited, there
is no
reason to treat a pass BY THAT HAND as forcing. Nor is there any reason to treat
his
partner's
pass as forcing since he can do the right thing facing a well-defined
hand.
(7)
Opener makes a single raise and
responder bids game. Forcing passes by the responder, VUL
vs
NONVUL, or by either player if "sound of bidding" warrants such a notion. So
says
Kantar.
According
to EOK:
This is
exactly the same case as: 1H-(1S)-2H-(2S); 4H.
Responder
will usually have a distributional hand and is on his own and may make
a
unilateral PENALTY
DOUBLE or bid on, as he planned to do. Opener is invited to make
a
PENALTY
DOUBLE of his own but he is otherwise expected to PASS. There are
no
FORCING
PASSES. This is a variation of he SPECIAL CASE.
(8)
Opener's side voluntarily bids game
with no established fit. All
subsequent passes by both
partners
are forcing.
(9)
If both sides have an established fit, and both sides bid game,
and there have been no weak
jump
overcalls, takeout, responsive or negative doubles, forcing passes are in effect
when:
(a) VUL
vs NONVUL (by the unlimited hand only);
(b)
Opener leaped from one to four in partner's suit showing a big balanced
hand;
(c) The
"sound of the bidding" demands it (they are sacrificing);
(d) Your
side clearly has the preponderance of high cards.
So says
Kantar.
According
to EOK:
(a) does
not ring true. No one has shown the preponderance of high cards. Everyone
may
be a
trick or two beyond their depth and gambling slightly. Passes are NONFORCING
but
DOUBLES
show TRANSFERABLE VALUES and express an
opinion about "ownership" of
the hand.
( D.S.I.P. BOB C )