2007-10-08 20:16
Hand Evaluation – Tactics ( 30 HCP rule )
PITBULLS:
Splinter theory brings in the “30 HCP in
the deck” rule. When the 10 HCP’s opposite your stiff are in the opponent’s hand ,
you need a lot less HCP’s to make
a game or slam. You think in terms of the deck only holding 30 HCP’s & bid
accordingly. All of a sudden , 26 HCP’s for your
side means slam rather than game. Duplication of value is non-existent
so overbidding is encouraged.
Another
not so obvious application of the
30 HCP in the deck rule , is when the opponents pre-empt. The odds favour that the HCP’s are in their 7 card
suit & if their partner contracts for a 3NT game especially , you can assume that they have all 10 HCP’s in
that suit wrapped up. At both tables nv
in an IMP league , 3♣ was opened & partner
bid 3NT . Here is where the auction went drastically different at both tables. ♠Axx ♥x ♦AKJ1098x ♣xx so what is your bid
after the opponents 3NT bid ? I think that it is
obvious from the auction that the
30 HCP rule is in effect
& the opponents own their club suit.
There are 7 club tricks running in NT & they have 10 HCP’s in clubs that
you do not have to worry too much about for bidding purposes. At one table , they made a penalty double hoping that the queen of
diamonds would drop. This action does not work as the opponents have 10 top
tricks so you are –650 in 3NTX for the doubled overtrick.
At the other table , a Tormentee chose a pass.
I do not feel that a pass is a good bid in
the context of the “30 HCP rule” . They should have 7
tricks ready to roll in NT , so how can bidding 4♦ hurt ? It disturbs
their 3NT auction & 4♦ might even make.
Sometimes 3NT is bid with a club fit as a “tactic” & you can have game your way !! At
one table a local couple “knew”
that that the other partner did not have
his penalty double & bid 4♠ with ♠QJ10xxx
♥Jxxxx ♦x ♣x . I would have bid 4♣
& with a quick double of partners 4♥ bid
, I would retreat to 4♠. I think this action describes my pull of
3NT better.
Anyway, they bid 4♠
with that hand so what do you do with this hand ? ♠Kxx ♥AKQ109 ♦Qxx ♣KQ
Partner cannot hold less than ♣AJ10xxxx so with the information that there was a
double to your left & a pull to your right you can bid a simple 4NT. You can count 10 tricks in NT as long as the doubler
has the ♦AK & the ♠A which he must have for the double & pull to make any sense. You bid 4NT to play .
It turns out 4♠X is an excellent sacrifice as it only goes down one or two with best
declarer play. 5♣ cannot make the other direction as they are off 3 quick
tricks.
Perry
& I bid a nice slam recently based on the 30 HCP rule &
the opponent’s bidding . Perry
opened 2♣ & Nick Gartaganis jumped to 3♥ catching me with ♠xx
♥Ax ♦K1098x ♣J9xx
. I passed & Perry doubled alerted by me as showing
the NT family of hands. In considering Perry’s hand in the 22-24 range with no HCP’s in the heart suit as an odds on
assumption , you are in effect playing with a 30 HCP deck. Give Perry 23 HCP as a median,
means we have 27 HCP of the 30
remaining HCP’s outside of the heart suit. This suggests that we should be near
the grand slam level , if we have a minor fit. I leapt to 4NT, so Perry chose his best minor by bidding 5♣.
I could see no intelligent way of getting to a grand slam in clubs , so I bid 6♣.
The trumps split badly ( 4-1 ) so Perry made only
+1370. The hand is cold for 13 tricks by establishing diamonds if the trump were
3-2 . This slam was worth 13 IMPs for our side as the
opponents bid game only with their combined 32 HCP
missing the ♥KQJ , holding a minor 4-4
fit & a 5 card side suit. I
guess they never heard of the 30 HCP rule at their
table J