Hand
Evaluation - Counting Distribution ( Kantar )
PITBULLS:
You
can not get away from bidding skills in
the game of Bridge . Even on defense and
declarer play you must have a thorough understanding of the opponents & your bidding in order to apply
patterns to their distribution. You cannot defend properly without
having a hypothetical “count of
declarers hand” on every hand – no exceptions !
The following article by Kantar ( jumping in at the
middle somewhere ) concentrates on the responder
becoming declarer so as
defenders you want to count the distribution for those hands .
Two simple hands came up Thursday night for a
total loss of 32 IMPs because of a lack of applications of patterns again . The opponents are in
a vul 4♥ , I led the spade 8 .
The board comes down with ♠xxx ♥Qxxx ♦KQx ♣Axx & you have ♠AQJxx
♥J ♦Jxxx ♣Jxx . You plug in the spade
pattern and its 5-3-3-2 so you put in the spade jack. Why ?
Even though it’s a suit contract , NT rules apply
here. The only way you are beating 4 hearts is if partner can contribute . You need an entry to your spades when he gets
in though. Partner has the diamond Ace & heart King so you get 4 tricks.
You play the spade Ace at trick one & you suffer the ignominy of watching
the 3-3 club brake take your spade trick away with them making it. Instead of
winning 4 IMPS you lose 12.
The
next hand is a question of do you give count in the opponents suit. If you do not , it will be very expensive. You hand is ♠xx ♥K82 ♦Jxxxx ♣Qxx , the auction goes
1♠-P-2♣-P
2♥-P-2♠-P
4♠-P-P-P .
Partner leads a club , the board is ♠1098 ♥xx ♦KQx ♣AKxxx . He wins the
club and leads a heart at trick two . Which heart do
you play ? If you play the deuce ,
partner will play you for four hearts ( upside down count ) . He now knows
declarer is 5-4-3-1 so when he leads a diamond to the KQ it is safe for partner
to duck as its not going anywhere. If declarer is 5-5
in the majors partner must hop up with the diamond Ace
or its going away on the club. Either the
heart 8 or deuce is again a 16 IMP swing. When declarer leads her suit , it is safe to give partner count.
You
should only be deceptive with count ,
if it is going to hurt declarer more than partner. Usually it’s best to give
partner count & ignore the fact that declarer is getting the same
information.
Below is an article by Kantar (
jumping in somewhere) where he is teaching translating bidding to
patterns which is an essential Bridge skill. You “read the bidding” so patterns
can be generated.
Excerpt from
“Eddie Kantar
Teaches Advanced Bridge Defense”
© 1999 Edwin B. Kantar
Responder is quite apt to become
the declarer, particularly if opener supports one of responder’s suits, if
responder has a long, strong suit, or if responder bids notrump
and plays there.
The rules stay in place. If responder bids two suits, assume 5-4; if responder bids the
same suit, assume a six-card suit; if the initial response is a natural 2NT or
3NT (not 1NT) assume one of the three balanced distributions.
Opener
Responder
1§ 1©
pass
The assumption is that responder has six hearts and
fewer than four spades. Had responder jumped to 3© over
1ª, the
assumption would still be a six-card suit. However, had responder jumped to 4© over
1ª, not
knowing of any heart support, seven hearts is more likely than six.
Opener
Responder
1§
1ª
2ª 2NT
3ª pass
Responder has four spades and denies four hearts. With
4-4 in the majors, the normal response is 1©. What
about diamonds? Has responder denied four diamonds by skipping over that suit
too? No. In the modern game the emphasis is on bidding major suits as quickly
as possible before competition, particularly preemptive competition,
may cause you to ‘lose the suit’. With strong hands, hands approaching
opening-bid strength, responder can afford to go slowly and bid 1¨
(especially with strong diamonds) and then bid the major next, but with weaker
hands, the major suit is normally bid first. (As
usual, you should realize that not everyone plays this way. Ask!)
Opener
Responder
1§ 1ª
2ª
4ª
pass
This one is also a bit tricky. If
opener ‘promises’ four spades with that raise (as some play), then responder
can leap to game with a four-card spade suit. However, if opener can
have three spades, as most play, then the leap to 4ª shows
at least five spades. Ask.
Opener
Responder
1¨ 1ª
2¨ 2©
2NT
3©
4© pass
Play responder for 5-5 in the majors.
Opener
Responder
1¨ 1©
2¨
2ª
2NT
3ª
4© pass
Play responder for five spades and six hearts. With
5-5, regardless of strength, the first response is in spades, the
higher-ranking suit, not hearts.
Opener
Responder
1¨
1ª
2ª 3NT
pass
Responder has exactly four spades and denies four
hearts. Opener apparently has three spades. With four spades, opener usually
returns to 4ª on this sequence. However, if
opener has promised four spades with the raise, opener may pass 3NT.
Distributional inferences change dramatically when the
original response is 2NT as opposed to an original suit response followed by a
2NT rebid.
Opener Responder
1¨ 2NT
3§
3©
3NT
pass
Responder is balanced and does not figure to have a
four-card major. The 3© bid says ‘my hearts are
stronger than my spades so don’t bid 3NT unless you have a spade honor or spade
length’. Perhaps responder has: ª Q54 © AKJ ¨ 1076 § K532.
Now compare the previous sequence to this one:
Opener
Responder
1¨
2§
2ª 2NT
3NT
pass
The 2NT rebid does
not necessarily promise a balanced hand;
responder might be 3-4-1-5 or even 3-3-1-6.
Be wary of a 1NT response, particularly to a
major-suit opening bid.
Opener
Responder
1ª 1NT
3NT pass
Responder does not necessarily have a balanced hand.
He may have a wildly distributional hand that is not strong enough to respond
at the two level. To give you an idea of what
responder could have: ª void © J8743 ¨ K43 § Q10874.
Sometimes a 1NT responder has a chance to show a
six-card minor.
Opener
Responder
1© 1NT
2NT
3¨
pass
Play responder for at least six diamonds, fewer than
three hearts, and fewer than four spades.
In the previous sequences only
the opponents were bidding. It was almost as if your side had a case of
terminal lockjaw. On most hands the defenders join in and many of the bids your partner makes shows a specific number of
cards in a particular suit. For example, if your partner opens 2© weak, you partner has six hearts.
If the opponents play the hand, you will know the moment the dummy comes down
how many hearts declarer has. (Of course declarer also knows how many hearts
you have.)
The more bidding your side does
the easier it is to count declarer’s hand. Try this one from the East chair:
North-South Vul ª A93
Dealer South
© 96
¨
KQ96
§
A975
North(Dummy)
East(You)
ª 8
© K10852
¨ AJ743
§ J3
West North East South
1©
2ª*
Dbl** Pass 2NT
Pass
3NT All Pass
Partner leads the §2, fourth best. What is declarer’s distribution? You can do it! Just go back to the bidding
and the opening lead.
There are three clues:
declarer’s 1©
bid, partner’s 2ª bid and the
lead of the §2. Declarer figures to have five
hearts (did not rebid hearts); partner should have six spades, leaving declarer
three; the §2 shows four, so declarer has three
clubs. Putting it all together, declarer should have a 3-5-2-3 hand pattern.
Defenders can also take
inferences from what partner does not bid. For example:
West North East South
(You)
1© 1ª
2© 2ª
All Pass
Partner’s pass of 2ª denies six hearts. With six hearts
partner is supposed to compete to 3©. Knowing partner has only five hearts tells
you how many hearts declarer has (when dummy comes down). Similarly your raise
to 2© normally shows three hearts.
Holding four hearts you are supposed to compete to 3© yourself. The rule
is not to let the opponents play at the two-level if your side has a nine-card fit. Important.
When someone preempts
When either side makes a
preemptive bid, counting becomes easier for everybody, particularly when the
preemptive bidder becomes declarer. Why?
Because when declarer is known to have a long suit there are fewer
‘other’ cards left to count!
Both Vul
ª K5
Dealer South
© 876
¨
KJ109
§
J976
North(Dummy)
West(You)
ª
82
©
KQ4
¨
A753
§
A543
West North East South
3ª
All Pass
You lead the ©K, partner encourages with the ©9, and you continue with the ©Q and a heart to partner’s jack,
declarer following. Partner switches to §2, declarer plays the king, you win and return §3 (showing four); dummy plays the §9, partner the §10, and declarer ruffs. Are you
counting? Declarer exits with a low diamond. What do you do?
Play low. The clues are all there. The
bidding tells you that South has seven spades. The
play in hearts indicates that declarer has three hearts and declarer is known
to have a singleton club. Declarer must be
7-3-2-1, so you want to give declarer a guess in diamonds by playing
low.
Declarer’s hand is: ª AQJ10xxx © xxx ¨ xx
§ K.
One
further point. Let’s go back to the heart suit:
©
876
North(Dummy)
West(You)
East(loving
partner)
©
KQ4
© AJ93
South
©
1052
When partner wins the third
round of hearts with the ©J, you know partner still has the ©A. However, if partner is careless
and wins the third round of hearts with the ©A, partner denies
the ©J.
Now you have a miscount on the hearts which is why it is mega-important for
defenders to take a trick with the lower or
lowest equal.
If partner wins a third heart
with the ace, and defender eventually leads a diamond, you should fly with your
ace playing declarer for a 7-4-1-1 pattern. Can you see now why good players
make so many more mistakes when not playing with other good players? Their partners screw them up!