Thursday, September 28, 2006 2:15 AM
Hand Evaluation - Counting HCP'S ( Bidding )
PITBULLS:
With
years of experience in the game of Bridge , counting
HCP’s becomes a routine skill. More advanced counting of
HCP’s is during the hand as declarer or on
defense. This is called being a “human odometer” as you keep track
of HCP’s as they are being played. This skill can also become routine
with practice
. This skill is assumed if you are a Bridge
expert.
The
last domain for the counting of HCP’s is during the bidding . This is called quantitative bidding.
You add partners announced bids to yours & make partial , game & slam decisions. Balancing is also done
by adding expected HCP’s that the opponents have shown & weighing the risks
of entering the auction.
Counting
HCP’s is a way of a check back for leaving in penalty doubles of your 3NT
doubled. A bid I like which was invented by Meckwell
apparently is the XX expressing doubt. Your partner makes a bid that shows a
particular HCP range & lands in 3NT. You are not sure if the contract will
make or not. A pass says partner lets
play it in 3NT. A XX says “I have doubt” whether 3NT can make but I do have
some values or I would be running. If you have extra
, lets play it here. A solid partnership
understanding for handling 3NTX contracts..
Counting
HCP’s can assist you in making a decision whether to leave in your doubled 3NT
contract. Perry opened 1♥ with ♠xx ♥KQJxx ♦KJx
♣K10x , they overcalled 2♣. I bid 2♦ & Perry bid 2NT as would every Bridge player on
the planet. I carried on to 3NT & this was passed around to the overcaller who doubled. I did not pull 3NT but I
passed saying lets play this contract. Should
Perry believe the doubler & pull
? No , a simple count of HCP’s makes passing
clear cut. Partner has no HCP’s in clubs or he probably would have XX’d showing club values. Partner has shown 13-14 HCP’s on
the bidding so where are they , looking at your hand ?
The Ace of hearts & AQ of diamonds is not enough as that is only 10 HCP’s
so not consistent with the bidding. Partner must have spade cards also . The doubler is gambling on
a club lead , getting in with the spade Ace &
running his clubs. You have a surprise for him as you can count 11 tricks
before he leads ! You XX so they are
in serious trouble as they are vul vrs not. An unmitigated disaster for them as you
took the time to count partners HCP’s.
Counting
HCP’s during the bidding comes up frequently in slam bidding. If
partner makes a quantitative bid showing X number of HCP’s ,
you just do arithmetic & leap to the correct level. Counting HCP’s are made
easier if partner makes a splinter bid as you can discount HCP’s in that
suit. A tormentee held this hand ♠AQJxx ♥A ♦AQxx ♣KQx
& partner opened 1♠ . She bid 2NT & partner
showed a stiff ♥ . This
auction is now over. Partner has an
opening bid with no HCP’s in hearts so where are they ?
♠K , ♦KJ & ♣AJ is only 12 HCP so where is
the opening bid ? You say skip bid 7♠ & partner should be able to claim as
your hand is completely filled in. A splinter gives you a clue to count
partners HCP’s during the auction. There are 40 HCP’s in the
deck.
Here
is a hand where counting HCP’s when partner is a passed hand is the key to
success. In 3rd seat vul my partner opened
1♣ & Osama overcalled 1♦ .
As a passed hand , I bid 2♠ with ♠J10876x ♥x ♦Q9x ♣QJx . Partner
has ♠void ♥AQJx ♦AJxx ♣AKxxx so
bells should start ringing. Why didn’t partner open a weak 2♠ in first seat ? The obvious answer is that her spade suit was not
good enough but when partner opens the bidding , you can take
the chance with a weak jump shift. OK , if partner
does not have HCP’s in spades where are they ? If not in diamonds given
the overcall , not in spades so they must be in clubs
& hearts . Happiness , you may have 9 top tricks
in NT , so you leap to 3NT which is cold for +600. Partner missed the
weak 2♠ inference & thought my HCP’s were in spades which does not make
any sense. He passed 2♠ & I went down 2 vul
on a cross ruff when 3NT was lay down.
Doubling
NT contracts & leaving in the double or their XX is simply counting
HCP’s during the auction. Some dreadful Bridge decisions were made recently
because the players simply did not bother to count the HCP’s during
the auction. This blunder resulted in very expensive wrong decisions as
1NTXX making vul is –760 .
Counting HCP’s during the bidding meant the HCP’s were evenly divided 20-20 so
risking a XX game contract was silly. Too close to call for that sort of
gambling.