Tuesday, March
23, 2004 9:35 PM
Hand Evaluation - Partnership ( Competitive bidding )
PITBULLS:
In
the early days of Bridge , penalty doubles were invented to punish bad
bidders. The penalty double was ambiguous
as it was done on a trump stack or
HCP values - it did not matter. The message was “opponent you bid
badly” so you are to be punished.
In today’s game , in match points & rubber bridge
, weak Bridge players & bad bidders still exist . The traditional penalty double
should probably be employed in those games.
Should
these trump stack penalty doubles in competition still exist in IMPS ? No , for a variety of reasons .1st
reason is that Bridge is a
partnership game & penalty doubles are a very single handed bid that can lead to a
disaster. Competitive doubles can invite “partner to the party” so a joint decision can be made. This
competitive double is “taking out insurance” that the contract can in fact be
set. Two heads are better than one. The competitive double prevents bidding your hand again & gambling by flying solo with
dire consequences when you are wrong. You ask partners permission to bid again
so you do not make unilateral decisions
for the partnership. Trump stack penalty doubles are only done via converting which is far safer to ensure setting the contract.
The 2nd reason
for not playing “trump stack”
doubles in IMPS is the ambiguity
of the bid. Penalty doubles are ambiguous for
pulling doubles. Partner does not
know if they based on HCP’s which
might help his decision to bid more
or a trump stack which is bad duplication of
value for bidding purposes. It’s a
crap shoot on when to pull penalty doubles.
Advocates of trump stack doubles usually threatened partner with a “never pull
my penalty doubles edict”. This is of course is stupid in IMPS as penalty doubles should be pulled in many
situations but it is just a gamble
either way. Doubling 4♥ for –300 when you
can make +1370 is a huge loss for your side.
The 3rd reason
for not playing “trump stack”
doubles in IMPS , is the double simply can be put to a
better & more frequent use to show “cards”
with a lack of duplication of value
in their suit. In good IMP matches , the opponents do
not bid badly with bad suits . They take advantage of the “law of total tricks’
so make things difficult for you with minimum risk for their side. Using an unambiguous double just to “show cards” simplifies many auctions for you as they
use their fit for pre-emptive value.
You do not have your contract “stolen”
from you by their bidding. Card showing
doubles are good for “anti-terrorism”. The IMP scale itself robs you with huge
sets from penalty doubles anyway.
The 4th reason for using competitive doubles is the clockwise nature of the game of Bridge.
With penalty doubles , you may bid in front of partner
who has a trump stack. A
competitive double allows you to stay out of partners way so a penalty can be extracted
by converting. Do not rescue bad
bidding opponents by bidding with good defensive hands in front of partner. A
competitive double,
keeps the partnerships options
open.
The 5th reason for using competitive doubles is that
the double can be used for better purposes depending on the context of the auction. The
competitive double can be used as a game try , a Q bid
or a Western Q bid. A trump stack double
is a very narrow use of a good bid. Your bidding accuracy improves
with the competitive double.
The 6th reason for using competitive doubles is that
they allow you to compete better . If you bid again without
doubling you are truly competing.
If you bid again with a double , you have serious
intentions. There is no ambiguity that bidding again shows a good hand or just competing as with
standard methods. You do not push opponents into games that make due to the
ambiguity of your competitive bidding. You can compete better by avoiding going
for a number yourself as you ask partners permission to compete again. You can
make “negative free bids” in that you did not compete with a double. The over/under rule helps you to compete better. Not selling out in competitive auctions
with a double gives you maximum flexibility. In some situations
, the double allows you to scramble to your best fit when competing.
The 7th reason for using competitive doubles is the
wide HCP range
for bids in the modern game. Overcalls , T/O dbls , negative doubles & opening bids have such a huge
disparity for HCP ranges , you need a
double to clarify the strength of
your hand & not being interpreted as a trump stack in their suit. The
double can indicate that your side has the “balance of power” rather than a trump
stack in their suit. You use the opponents
interference as a “stepping stone” to clarify
your own auction.
The 8th
reason for using competitive doubles is they prevent pseudo sacrifices. If you own the auction , forcing pass
theory applies. Sacrificing by you of course does not factor into
the equation in forcing pass theory. They own the auction so on one vulnerability competitive
doubles apply. You can ask partners permission to sacrifice rather than do it
single handed. Partner can nix your request with duplication in their suit.
Slam undoubles come back in vogue.
The 9th reason for using competitive doubles is that
the double is used like a “splinter’ in that it identifies a lack of duplication
of value in their suit. Showing a lack
of duplication of value in their trump suit ,
allows more accurate
game bidding & competing for partials. This understanding of
the double is the core of
competitive double theory.
The 10th reason for using competitive doubles it that
you have an unambiguous structure
that parallels forcing pass theory
for auctions that you are just competing. New uses for the pass
, double & bidding a suit to assist your competitive & game
bidding decisions. You have more information with which to work in making your competitive decisions
under the 5 level. You handle opponents pre-empts
& balances better in that there is no ambiguity regarding their trump suit. Trump stacks are
shown via the green card when they pre-empt at the 4 level. The competitive double shows the nature of your HCP’s better.
Controls ( quick tricks ) vrs
soft values for reaching correct contracts. The competitive double shows
defensive hand types with quick
tricks as opposed to distributional hand
types.
In
summary, the
game of IMPS with its method of scoring
has just become too sophisticated for the trump stack penalty double in competition. Time to retire the bid.