Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:31 PM
Hand Evaluation – Tactics ( Doubles )
PITBULLS:
D.S.I.P.
competitive double theory is based on & assumes disciplined bidding by your side. You must have your quick tricks for your
opener . You have values expected for a 2 level overcall . Your T/O doubles &
balances have appropriate defensive values for the level of the bid. Even your
systemic toys should be disciplined as
to weak or strong.
What
if these bids are not disciplined ? A D.S.I.P. competitive double
wanting to compete again could lead to disaster as partner must bid again when that is the last thing she wanted to do. She
never had her bid in the first place so
just wanted to muddy the waters with her opener or overcall. This style should
only occur if partner is a passed hand
or nv vrs vul
in an expert partnership.
We have written before that partner should be careful with D.S.I.P. competitive
double theory with this vulnerability scenario & just let “sleeping dogs
lie” . If partner does not have her bid , you will push them to game or you could go for an ugly set at a higher
level.
What
should be the solution to this tactical bidding & D.S.I.P. theory ?? Just give
leeway & not compete at this one vulnerability by one partner
? I have been reading many accounts of
World championships , Vanderbilts
& Spingolds . This is what the Meckwells & other swing
pairs do on a regular basis.
They open & overcall with such utter garbage ,
partner just gives them maximum leeway
so does not make a penalty double or over compete. This is the price to pay
when you do not trust partner for
any values. Sometimes they miss slams or games based on this mistrust.
I
feel this is also the way to go with D.S.I.P competitive double
theory when partner may be very light for her opener or overcall. Just give up , believe the opponents so put the green
card on the table. You cannot have it both ways.
If you are going to use pressure tactics
on this one vulnerability scenario
or when partner is a passed hand , D.S.I.P. theory should not apply. If you are the one who
opened or overcalled on this vulnerability even opposite a passed hand, D.S.I.P. theory is fine but partner should be very careful
.
Should
we go back to trump stack doubles
with this vulnerabity ? No , Meckwell
& others do not trust partner even for trump stack doubles
from the hands which I have read in the Bridge World. They just take their undoubled plus. I guess D.S.I.P. competitive double theory
should apply 7/8 of
the time. 100 % in 3 out of the 4 vulnerabilities . On
the 4th vulnerability , only by the overcaller or opener. Partner
should use the green card instead of the D.S.I.P. red card in this situation. Discretion is the better part of valour .
D.S.I.P.
doubles on three of the vulnerabilities at the game level means that I would like to bid again to make the contract or have you convert the
double to set them. D.S.I.P. doubles at the game level nv vrs vul should
say I would like to sacrifice unless
you have the defense to beat them. Asking permission to sacrifice at this one vulnerability makes sense to
me.