2008-06-06 02:54
Hand Evaluation – Forcing NT ( Jump Rebids )
PITBULLS:
Playing
the 3♣ multi-purpose strong jump shift has a very nice side effect. Hands in the 16-18 HCP range with poor suits do not have to be bid with a jump
rebid in the major at the 3 level or 4 level with even more HCP’s . This is the hand evaluation concept of evaluating good suits rather
than HCP’s. You have ♠Axxxxx ♥Axx ♦AKx ♣Kx & open 1♠.
Partner
responds 1NT ,
you have 16-18 HCP so in standard
bidding you bid 3♠. This is where you play the hand so you miss your +650
in hearts. Our bidding goes a 3♣ jump shift & a relay to 3♦ & a 3♠ bid . Warned that partner has HCP’s rather than a good suit , partner tries 4♥ & that ends the
auction . Over 3♦ , opener would bid 4♠ with a good suit in that HCP range. Responders hand was ♠x ♥KJ10xx ♦xxxx ♣QJx . In addition , responder
could have broke the relay to 3♥ with a good hand
& 6♥ could be reached. A
jump rebid in the majors with
this understanding , shows a good suit not HCP’s. ♠AKQ10xx ♥KQx ♦xxx ♣x is a 3♠ rebid despite the 14
HCP’s. If we had more HCP’s with that suit , we can
evaluate our hand to a 3♣ bid.
This
understanding has a trickle down effect. Rebidding 2♠
& 3♠ is a very pre-emptive bid after partners forcing 1NT. Due to the rank of the suit , you consume all the bidding room which forces partner to the 3 level where she does not want to tread.
. Kokish says if you have an intermediate hand in
HCP’s without
a good 6 card suit , rebid 2♣ instead of your 6 card major.
Partner is not allowed to pass with a minimum & two of your major. She must give you preference. ♠AK10xxx ♥AJx ♦x ♣Axx so Goren says this is a
3♠ rebid as you have 16-18 HCP , a 6 card suit with
invitational values. Kokish disagrees. Since you have an
intermediate hand where they may be a 4♥ game or an alternative contract ,
rebid 2♣. Partner cannot pass 2♣ with ♣KQxx(x) & a doubleton
spade. After responders spade preference , you can
invite to 3♠ which is where the standard bidders were with the initial
rebid. You have left room to get to another
strain though , if responder does not have spades. Excellent !!
Chris
& Tom went 1 down in 3NT , cold for 5♥ because Chris rebid 3♠
with the above hand. Tom was trapped & virtually
forced to bid 3NT. Just have one simple understanding with the forcing 1NT . Responder must
keep the bidding open
with 2 trump
& this style works well. Same with all bad 6 card majors at the two level
with a chance of an alternative contract.
You have the best of both worlds with this understanding. ♠Q10xxxx
♥Kxx ♦Ax ♣Ax so you open 1♠. Partner bids 1NT so
now both a 2♠ & a 3♠
rebid
shows a decent suit. With this hand , bid 2♣ &
partner must bid 2♠ with a doubleton so
you get to your correct
2♠ contract a different way.
When partner has a stiff spade , she can bail to her
suit or pass 2♣ if that is her suit
& you avoided a bad partial swing. Opener should not get carried
away though & bid a 2 card ♦ suit or a singleton club.
Rebid your 6 card major in that case.
The
same reasoning can be used with the heart
suit. It all stems for the 3♣ multi-purpose strong jump shift
in the first instance & trickles down
to a simple rebid in the major. This understanding prevents pre-empting partner
in 2 or 3 of a major without a
decent suit. Bridge is a game
of suits says Garazzo. Rebiding your major suit at the two or 3 level after a
forcing 1NT , shows a decent suit rather than the Goren dependence on HCP’s. You play in a partial with a good suit this way . Boy , what a concept
!! Points
, Schmoints .