Sunday, October 17, 2004 9:42 PM

Hand Evaluation – Forcing Passes ( Cues )

 

PITBULLS:

 

            Playing forcing pass theory you must look for the cues that turn on forcing passes . These cues trigger or turn on forcing pass theory.  Forcing passes with their implications are a huge part of Bridge for expert partnerships. It is a way of making joint decisions in high level competitive auctions instead of one partner just taking a guess. Honing in on the nuances of auctions that switch on forcing passes for your side is a must. Cue #1 is vulnerability with a vul game bid by your side.   An opponent vul opened a Flannery 2 with ♠xxxx AKxxx AKx x  , my nv partner overcalled 3♣. They leaped to 4 so I bid 5♣ . What should the Flannery  bidder do ? Partner bid a vul game so it’s your hand. If you own the auction ,  forcing pass theory applies . The opponents bidding your stiff  makes your hand better so you want to encourage partner to bid 5 . A pass is forcing & conveys the message partner I prefer you to bid 5 “ A double says the 5 level belongs to the opponents partner . A 5 bid within a systemic auction is just not allowed ( violates captaincy ) as partner knows your hand already. With this hand partner declines the invitation with her minimum so 5♣X goes for 500.

 

            Maurice had ♠Qxxx Qx AKJ10xx ♣x  against Peter Jones and partner . The auction went 1♣-P-1-2  by Maurice vul vrs not , I Q bid  2. This Q bid ( strength showing )  means that it is our hand so forcing passes apply even after overcalls ( Cue #2 )  . Peter Jones bid 4♣, his partner bids 4 & I contract for a vul 5 game .  Peter Jones bids 5so what should Maurice do ? He should double at the speed of light saying he has a dog so let’s just take our plus. We got our +500 so on to the next hand. A forcing pass by Maurice shows an invite to 6 with a heart control.

 

            Another Maurice auction . He held ♠AQxx A J109x ♣KJ10x  , RHO opened 1 so he doubled vul vrs not  . The auction went 2 , 4vul by me around to the 2bidder who now decided to bid 5 . I passed & around to Maurice. Forcing passes apply after the T/O double with partner bidding a vul game against not  so what should Maurice do ? I said I wanted to bid 5 with my pass . Maurice accordingly bids 5 & they need to find a ruff to beat 6 as I held Kxxxx xxx KQxxxvoid . 5 doubled only goes for +300.

 

            Do not forget forcing pass theory in these kind of auctions also.

 

 4-P-P-X

 P-4-P-P

 5♦-X      The opponents were willing to play in a partial & we bid a vul game so it’s our hand with forcing pass theory applying. I doubled saying I wanted no part of 5  .   If I passed ,  it shows a willingness to bid 5. With my partner’s hand ,  we should be close to making 6♥. I would pass with  Qxx KQxxxx xx ♣xx  saying I would like to bid 5.  Partner actually held ♠AKxx Axx x ♣AKxxx   , 1430 would be lay down .    I doubled with my hand xxx QJxxx xxx ♣xx  warning  that 5 is not the spot.

 

            Cue #3 is  where passes are forcing from one side only . This situation is where one partner has indicated a huge hand by opening 2♣ or making a takeout double & bidding game single handedly vul or other strong action. A takeout double or even an overcall with a subsequent Q bid also can turn on “one way” forcing passes. The big hands pass is forcing on the little hand but not vice versa ( captaincy ) . The pass by the hand who never “attended the party “ is not forcing on the big hand due to captaincy. The pass has the old fashioned meaning that “I am broke”. The double by the little hand directly means I am not entirely broke.

 

 The auction went  1 -X-1-P   

                      2-4-5-?      I doubled & jumped to game vulnerable against not vul so they bid 5. Tom had ♠xx xxx xxxx A9xx  so he doubled to tell me that he can contribute something to this auction. The double helped me so I took the vul push , got doubled & made an overtrick.  What if Tom held ♠xx xxx xxxxxxxx  ?   He would pass 5 so I would act accordingly that he is probably broke over there. Why the difference in forcing pass theory ? This is due to the fact that partner has never been involved in the bidding.

 

What if our auction went a little differently ?.  Same auction but instead of LHO bidding 5 , RHO bids 5 . Now the huge hand makes a forcing pass to partner . The little hand must do something. With Toms first hand ♠xx xxx xxxxA9xx , the Ace would tip the scale in favour of  a 5bid . With the 2nd hand xx xxx xxxxxxxx  he must double ! Partner doubled &  contracted for 10 tricks vul & passed a 5 level decision around to you. You cannot shirk your responsibility

                                            

           These hands came up recently & there was a common thread among all of the hands. Not once was the forcing pass element picked up at the table so wrong decisions were made on all the above hands. These examples mean that the cues that turn on forcing passes are just being missed. The players are not tuned into the “ownership” hand evaluation concept.  Bridge players should read auctions like golfers read greens.

 

People who usually play with weak partners have trouble with forcing pass theory. They miss out on the joint decisions that forcing pass theory brings to the partnership because they are used to making the decisions for the partnership. Ignoring forcing pass theory , means that you must make the decision for the partnership single handedly , so very bad results usually follow. With important decisions , both hands should contribute to the final result. Strong auctions by your side i.e. 2/1 , game forcing strong jump shifts , Q bids , penalty doubles , 2/1 in competition or as a passed hand with game reached , all turn on forcing passes.