Tuesday, August 06, 2002 4:19 AM
Hand Evaluation - Invisible Q bids
PITBULLS:
The defenses shown here ( Invisible Q bids
) are pretty standard against unusual
2NT , both types of Michaels & Gambling 3NT.
It leaves the door open for a non forcing 4th suit bid which can
be tactically advantageous. The 4th suit as non
forcing is a “weak two” type of hand designed to “get in there”. The Q
bids are deemed to be invisible as you are Q bidding their suit before it is bid !!
2♦
1 ♦
3♣ ( non forcing )
2NT
1♠
3♥ ( non forcing
)
2♠
1♠
2NT ( forcing
minor )
2♥
1♥ 3♣/♦ (
non forcing )
The (other)
Michaels over a major opener is a matter of partnership agreement. Following
the logic of invisible Q bids , a bid of their implied major is a limit
raise or better for our major. This leaves 2NT as an invisible Q bid also.
This 2NT bid is reverse Lebensohl as a natural 2NT
bid should be described with a double. This forces 3♣ which is a forcing
bid or converted to 3♦ (
forcing ) . This means a direct bid of a minor is non
forcing.
INVISIBLE CUE BIDS
Invisible
Cue Bids allow responder to describe more hands after RHO intervenes with a
two-suited overcall, such as Unusual 2NT or Michaels.
Responder's bid of RHO's suit is similar to a cue bid, even though RHO's
suit has not actually been bid yet -- hence it is called an invisible cue
bid. The cheaper invisible cue bid is called Lo IQ in the
table below; the other invisible cue bid is called Hi IQ.
BID |
MEANING |
Example after 1♥ - (2NT) - ? |
Example after 1♦ - (2♦) - ? |
Example after Michaels Cue 1♥ - ( 2♥ ) = ? |
Lo Q Bid |
limit raise or better |
3♣ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
Hi Q Bid |
10+ and 5+ cards in fourth suit |
3♦*** |
2♠**** |
2NT relay
|
Jump Q Bid |
game forcing splinter |
4♣/4♦ |
3♥/3♠ |
3♠/4♥ |
Raise |
6-9 pts |
3♥ |
3♦ |
3♥/♠ |
New suit |
6-9 and 5+ cards in suit |
3♠ |
3♣ |
3♣/3♦ |
NOTES:
*
Two lower unbid, in this case Clubs and Hearts.
**
Majors
***
Shows SPADES
****
Shows CLUBS
Defense against
Gambling 3NT
A "penalty" double is useful not so much
because you hope to obtain a penalty from 3NT, but to enable you to distinguish
between strong, fairly balanced hands and strong unbalanced hands, in order to
help advancer to judge what to do when the other side bids four of their minor.
Invisible Q bids come into play after their gambling 3NT also.
I play double as balanced, 4♣
as a three-suiter with shortage in some minor,
and 4♦ as both majors.
After a 4♣ overcall, 4♦ asks for the
longer major, and 4NT (either immediately or preceded
by 4♦ asks for opener's minor.
As an alternative , one might play double as either
balanced or three-suited, and strong enough defensively to expect to defeat
either 3NT or four of a minor. Now if responder removes the double, a pass
by advancer is forcing, inviting the doubler to bid
with the three-suiter and to double with the balanced
hand. This scheme would make both 4♣ and 4♦
available to show two-suiters. One could define
new meanings to the 4♣ & 4♦ bid
and play something like:
4♣ = ♥+♣ or ♥+♦ or ♠+♣
(4♦ relay; now 4♥ shows ♥+min,
4♠ shows ♠+♣)
4♦ = ♠+♥
or ♠+♦
(advancer gives preference between the majors;
converting 4♥
to 4♠ shows ♠+♦)