Friday, June 09, 2006 12:12 AM
Hand Evaluation - Limited Minor Splinters
PITBULLS:
I
have always disliked splintering
after a minor opener. I felt that
they were too unwieldy giving too
much information to the enemy where the goal
with minors is to reach 3NT anyway. I played a jump to 3 level in a major
after a minor opener as a natural pre-empt.
Maurice has come up with a good compromise
with splinters. He suggests playing splinters after a minor opener as a pre-emptive tool. These splinter bids at
the 3 level show 5+ trump but values under a
limit raise. This makes a lot more sense. With such a narrow range , you can be disruptive to the opponents and as 3NT is
not in your sights , the bid can
lead to nice sacrifices. If you are strong , why waste
bidding room by jumping to the 3 level & forcing the auction to the 4 level
? Nonsense.
Left alone , 1♣-P-3♦/♥/♠ are all limited mini-splinters under the limit raise or better range. In competition , after a one or two level
overcall , I still like jumps to be
natural ( WJS ) after a minor opener but
jump Q bids can still be the “mini
splinter”. You hold ♠xxx ♥x ♦QJxxx ♣A10xx , partner opens 1♦. They overcall 1♥ so Maurice suggests
a 3♥ bid with this hand.
I like it ! If you were stronger ,
you would bid 2♥ to keep the bidding lower so eventually get to 3NT or
Q bid your stiff heart later for
slam purposes. This hand is too strong for a direct 3♦ bid
, 2♦ is silly & a Q bid overstates the hand.
Over
a T/O double of a minor opening , I like these jumps to be
the “mini-splinter” hands also. The
reason being that the doubler is advertising unbid suits , so the chance of you
having a weak jump shift is diminished or you would not like to play it there
anyway. As a passed hand
, we play fit showing jumps at the two
level in a major so we may as well play these mini-splinters at the 3 level there also. Hard to think that you
just forgot to pre-empt with your 7 card suit originally.
Speaking
of minors , how do you use minor suit KCB when you
have an implied minor fit found under
the 4 level in a non forcing to game auction ? My partner recommends using Kickback rather than 4 of the agreed minor.
The reason is that you may want to play 4 of a minor in a limit raise or better auction. In a game forcing auction ,
it is a different story. Returning
to 4 of the minor is KCB because
you are forced to game anyway.
When you play your Q bids & inverted minors as “limit raise” or better , with a Q bidding auction following, 4 of a minor is
not KCB . It is just defined as I
have nothing more to say. Q bids are not necessarily forcing to game so can be NT gropes. Therefore , sometimes you need to bail out at 4 of a minor. Kickback will be used as KCB in non forcing to game auctions or when you just found your minor fit at the 4
level. Makes sense to me.