Tuesday, July 12, 2005
1:36 AM
Hand
Evaluation - Godfather 2NT
PITBULLS:
Lets enumerate how many times an invitational 2NT bid occurs as responder without biding a forcing 1NT
first. The humble 1♣ opener . 1♣-P-1♦-P 1♥-P-2NT or 1♣-P-1♦-P 1♠-P-2NT or 1♣-P-1♥-P 1♠-P-2NT
or 1♣-P-1♦-P 2♣-P-2NT
or 1♣-P-1♥-P 2♣-P-2NT
or 1♣-P-1♠-P 2♣-P-2NT
Next the 1♦ opener . 1♦-P-1♥-P 1♠-P-2NT or 1♦-P-1♥-P 2♦-P-2NT or 1♦-P-1♠-P 2♦-P-2NT or 1♦-P-1♥-P 2♣-P-2NT
or 1♦-P-1♠-P 2♣-P-2NT
Next the 1♥ opener 1♥-P-1♠-P 2♥-P-2NT
or 1♥-P-1♠-P 2♣-P-2NT or 1♥-P-1♠-P 2♦-P-2NT
What
is a leap to 3NT ? Exactly 12-14 with a
stopper in the unbid suit(s) ?.
A rebid at the two level by opener in a new suit or otherwise can be as high as 17 HCP . The
best game or slam begins to be investigated at the 4 level after partner essentially has pre-empted the auction by bidding 3NT. What about all the responders
hands in these auctions that are greater
than 14 HCP ?
You now must bid a phony 3rd suit or
4th suit forcing which wrong sides the NT so gives no
idea to partner about the strength or distribution of your hand
? 4th suit forcing detracts from natural bidding & adds
awkwardness.
Would
it not be nice to have a 2NT as a game force
unless opener rebids her suit to stay in a partial ?
This leaves 4th suit forcing or 3rd suit forcing to be natural & exploratory. Right siding the 3NT or investigating slams starts at a lower level.
You
have 17 HCP with a 5-4-3-1 , open something that ends
up partner leaping to 3NT ? Do you make a slam try ?
Probably not , as you are in the 30 HCP range. What if
your singleton matches partners Jxxx or Axxx. You are cold for slam but did
not even try to get there. You could be cold for 5 of a minor but in 3NT off 5
losers in a wide open suit . 4th suit forcing auctions are
confusing. Would it not be nice if partner jumped to 3NT showing a strong NT
opener ( picture bid ) so you leap to 6NT with your
16-17 HCP hand knowing you have 33 HCP’s
?
The
2NT as a “new suit” simplifies auctions.
Understandings allows us to escape in a partial otherwise you can “pattern out” to show
your distribution & strength. Lets try a few auctions :
1♥-P-1♠-P 2♦-P-? ♠J10xxx
♥Qx ♦AQxx ♣AQ In standard methods you
must bid 3♣ 4th suit forcing or leap
to 3NT ?
Lets give opener ♠x ♥AKxxx ♦KJ10x ♣Kxx
, 6♦ is cold &
impossible to reach. Give partner ♠Q ♥AKxxx ♦KJ10x ♣xxx , she has an impossible
bid over 3♣. 3NT with no club stopper & wrong siding the contract ? Try these hands with 2NT forcing so you can
pattern out or right side the 3NT.
Ugly things happen in these 4th suit auctions like rebidding 4 card suits or rebidding bad 5 card suits.
There are no bids left as opener was forced
into a corner.
I like playing a jump rebid
as responder as “recovering the strong jump shift” so forcing with a good suit.
Partner opens 1♦ , you respond 1♠ on ♠AJ10xxx ♥Jx ♦xx ♣Axx
, partner rebids 2♦ . Rebidding 2♠
is a terrible underbid on a hand that was built for 3♠ invitational. Playing 2NT as a
one round force allows you to use 3♣ as NMF
for invitational hands ( similar to 2♦ after a 2♣
rebid) . Partner can not bid 3NT in these auctions as
you did not bid 2NT forcing so an invitational
sequence is coming up. Partner bids 3♥ or 3♦ , you bid 3♠ invitational.
Similar auction after a 1♥-2♥ rebid auction with a
10 HCP spade hand.
You hold ♠Axxx ♥Kx ♦xxxx ♣AQx , partner opens 1♦ . You bid 1♠ as you are all
controls so partner bids 2♦ so now what ? A leap to 3NT or a phony 3♣ which wrong sides
the 3NT & forces partner into a corner ? Would it
not be better to bid 2NT & over partners bid ,
support diamonds ? With an unsuitable hand partner can bail to 4NT so the NT is
right sided. Partner hand is ♠x ♥Axxx ♦AKxxxx ♣xx
so a grand slam in diamonds is on a hook ! Partner
could hold many other hands where 3NT is the
spot but right sided from the AQx of clubs side
!
I think the 2NT concept as a
“new suit” will pay dividends as
it gets rid of the ugly 4th suit
forcing at the two level. Right siding 3NT
contracts or getting to nice slams or minor suit games will garner a lot of
IMPS. As Granoveter says ,
the only thing you lose is playing in 2NT where exactly 2NT makes. We all know
how many times that occurs in IMPS. The rest of our system is designed not to play in 2NT anyway so lets make it complete.