Hand Evaluation - Preferential
Treatment
A No Trump Overcall System for
Current ACBL Restrictions
John Vega and Marty Lavine
The ACBL and Suction
Nature is not alone in its
abhorrence of vacuums. In 1998, the ACBL amended the section of the General
Convention Chart which relates to No
Trump defenses by requiring that direct overcalls "other than double
and 2♣, must have at least one
known suit." This change endorsed virtually all popular overcall systems
(e.g. Cappelletti, DONT, Brozel,
Astro, or Ripstra) while prohibiting our favorite; Suction. Suction is
unique among overcall systems in
that it combines one-suited and two-suited hands in the same overcalls.
For those not familiar with Suction,
it is a two-edged sword that removes uncertainty for the overcalling
side while simultaneously
introducing ambiguity in the opponents' method of coping with interference. It
accomplishes this while maintaining
the ability to describe all one- and two-suited hands.
In describing two-suited hands,
Suction avoids the use of bids such as "Clubs and a higher suit" or
"Spades
and a Minor." An Advancer,
facing a poor fit for the known suit after an overcall of this type, has
Hobsen's
choice of potentially leaping from
the frying pan into the fire or remaining fixed by his system. Inquiring
only when holding support for the
remaining suits will miss many opportunities to improve the contract, a
disadvantage at any form of scoring
but particularly costly at matchpoints if a major-suit fit lies
undiscovered.
The Basics of Suction
Suction uses a suit overcall to show
either a one-suited hand in the suit immediately above the overcall or a
two-suited hand in the touching
suits beginning two ranks above. For example, a 2 ♣ overcall of 1 No
Trump would show either a one-suiter
in Diamonds or a two-suiter in the Majors.
The only suit combinations left
unshown by the basic structure are the non-touching two-suiters in
Clubs/Hearts and Diamonds/Spades.
These are commonly shown by Double and 2 NT, respectively. A
Suction variant reverses the meaning
of the 2 ♠ and the 2 NT overcalls. This permits Advancer to show a
preference for Spades at the
two-level when the overcaller shows a two-suiter in Diamonds and Spades.
In the case of the combination overcalls
(showing the one- or two-suiters described above), Advancer
relays by bidding the next higher
suit. Overcaller can then Pass to show the one-suiter (gaining the
additional advantages of
transferring the hand so that Advancer's hand remains closed during the play as
well as placing the strong hand on
lead) or bid the next suit up the line, showing the two-suiter. Advancer
then Passes, corrects, or raises to
an appropriate level.
No doubt, the reason for the
preferential treatment shown to every No Trump overcall system other than
Suction was the difficulty it
creates with its initial ambiguity. The lack of an anchor suit both deprives
Responder of the ability to cue and
of the opportunity to show or deny stoppers. While passing with the
intent to initiate Lebensohl once
Overcaller's hand is defined is an option for Responder, such a strategy
permits the opponents free reign to
describe their hands and the 2 NT relay may no longer be available by
the time the auction returns.
A disadvantage to Suction (aside
from its current banishment) is its lack of efficiency in certain situations.
There are eight occasions where
either a one-suiter is shown at the three-level or a preference may be taken
at that level, including two occasions
involving major suits. Swapping the 2 ♠ and 2 NT overcalls, as
mentioned above, improves matters a
bit.
Preferences
Although the change to the General
Convention Chart may have outlawed the Suction convention in the
direct seat, it has not made it
impossible to use a No Trump defense, which combines one- and two-suited
hands in the same overcall. While
the new restriction requires the presence of at least one known suit, it
remains permissible to introduce
ambiguity as to the presence of a second suit.
We call this system Preferences,
although nominations for a better name are open. The underlying thread
is that all suit overcalls show
either a two-suiter in the touching suits immediately above the overcall
or a
one-suiter in the higher of those
two suits. As an illustration, an overcall of Two Diamonds shows either a
two suited hand in the Majors or a
one-suited hand in Spades. This complies with the GCC mandate, as
Overcaller is known to have Spades
in either instance.
Assuming initially a two-suiter,
Advancer takes a preference. Overcaller can then Pass with either hand
type when Advancer chooses the
higher suit, or correct when he holds the one-suiter and Advancer has
shown a preference for the lower
suit. With no preference between the two suits, Advancer should probably
show a preference for the known suit
as this not only allows the ambiguity of Overcaller's holdings to
continue through the auction, but
also gains the transfer and lead advantages described earlier.
The efficiency of this basic
structure can be improved by treating Double as the suit below Clubs. This
permits the Double to take over for
the 2 ♠ overcall, allowing a hand with both Minors or a Diamond one-
suiter to be shown at the two-level.
The trade-off of being able to stop at the two-level when holding the
Minors is offset by the lessening of
the disruptive value of replacing the 2 ♠ bid, as most pairs simply bid
right through an intervening Double.
Each partnership will need to determine which approach it wishes to
use.
As in Suction, the only two suit
combinations left unshown by the basic structure are the non-touching two-
suiters. The Double is also used to
show the Clubs/Hearts and Diamonds/Spades
combinations as the GCC does not require a known suit for the
Double. After this addition, the Double now indicates either:
1.
Clubs and Diamonds or Diamonds
2.
or Clubs and Hearts
3.
or Diamonds and Spades
It may look confusing, but it is
simple to use. As normal, Advancer assumes that Overcaller holds both
Clubs and Diamonds and takes a
preference between them. If Overcaller has the long Diamond hand and
Advancer shows a preference for
Clubs, Overcaller corrects to 2 ♦. When
Overcaller holds the other hand
types (the non-touching
two-suiters), he corrects the preference to the Major that he holds, thereby
showing
that Major and the unmatched Minor.
If a partnership leaves 2 ♠
with its original meaning, then the Double shows only the non-touching two
suiters. If this option is used,
Advancer indicates a preference on the assumption that Overcaller holds
Clubs and Hearts. Overcaller either
Passes the preference when holding Clubs and Hearts, or bids the next
higher suit to show the
Diamond/Spade two-suiter. Advancer then Passes or corrects as appropriate.
For completeness, a partnership may
wish to define a Double followed by a pull to No Trump at the lowest
level as showing the big balanced
hand for those occasions that the bridge gods deal a balanced 20 count
and an opponent has the temerity to
open a weak No Trump. This treatment is applicable to Suction as well,
humorously termed "Kirby" due
to the strength of the vacuum.
Preferences leaves overcalls of 2 ♠ (if you adopt
the expanded Double principle) and 2 NT undefined. As
all one- and two-suited hands types
are already shown, these bids may be used to describe three-suiters: 2
♠ shows any
three-suiter with Spades, and 2 NT a three-suiter without Spades,
specifically 1-4-4-4 (or no
Spades). A suggested follow-up to
the 2 ♠ bid would be 2 NT to ask for Hearts; 3 ♣ denying,
and ♦ ®
promising Hearts so that the
transfer advantages can still be had.
As a Club one-suiter will always be
played at a minimum of 3 ♣, and the 3 ♣ overcall is unspecified in
Preferences, a partnership may
choose to bid 3 ♣ directly when holding a Club one-suiter for its
increased
preemptive effect. If Preferences is
used in the balancing seat, this treatment ensures that the strong
opponent is placed on opening lead.
Advantage Preferences
Preferences retains many of the
advantages of the Suction structure. The opening side faces ambiguity after
every overcall, yet the overcalling side has the information
its needs to take a preference and place the
final contract without having to
face the quandary sometimes created by overcalls which fail to specify the
second suit.
What was a disadvantage of Suction,
its number of three-level conversions, is a strength of Preferences. By
replacing the relay structure with a
preference structure and loading the Double as described, the
number of
times Advancer's preference may
result in a three level contract is reduced to four, none of which
involves
bidding a Major at the three level.
Those four occasions are the preference to either Minor when held with
the unmatched Major, Clubs when
Overcaller has a Club one-suiter, and Clubs when Overcaller holds the
blacks.
In comparison, Cappelletti has seven
such occurrences. DONT, arguably, never requires a three-level
preference, but it does so as the
expense of five "frying pan" combinations, which either require
Advancer
to hold his peace in the face of an
ambiguous bid or risk a return to Overcaller's initial suit at the three-level
and telegraphing a misfit to the
opponents.
Given this system's efficiency in
two-level preferences, a partnership has wider latitude in overcalling with
lighter values or adverse
vulnerabilities. This also makes it more viable than other systems for use over
natural 2 NT and 3 NT
openings.
Balancing
At present, there are no ACBL
General Chart prohibitions on conventional calls in the balancing seat
following a 1 NT opening. Feel free
to adapt this system for use in balancing as well.
Given the value of a balancing seat
Double, a partnership may wish the "unload" the Double, having the 2
♠ overcall retain
its original meaning (♣ and ♦ or long ♦) and use 2 NT to show the untouching two-
suiters. After a balancing 2 NT
showing the untouching two suiters, Advancer indicates a preference on the
assumption that Overcaller holds
Clubs and Hearts. Overcaller passes with that combination, or corrects the
preference to the next higher suit
with Diamonds and Hearts, which Advancer passes or corrects. As an
alternative, those who are unwilling
to let the ACBL have the final word may continue to use Suction for
balancing situations.