Monday,
October 27, 2003 1:33 AM
Hand
Evaluation – HCP’s ( Quantitative Bidding )
PITBULLS:
HCP’s work well in NT contracts.
Everyone is familiar with the standard quantitative auctions
. 1NT-4NT or 2NT–4NT. A little less familiar
are the 1NT– 5NT & 2NT–5NT auctions which say bid 7NT with a maximum or 6NT
with a minimum. In the old days, responder had a way of showing
slam interest immediately holding a lot of HCP’s via the strong jump shift. In
today’s game , quite often you must make up for the lack of
responder’s SJS bid , by bidding quantitatively.
The alternative of taking control with a big
hand & not inviting partner to the party is for beginners.
When
partner has forced to game with a
2/1 or a 4th suit forcing auction ,
a leap to 3NT has a meaning. In
all cases a jump to 3NT shows extra with a hand
in the 15-17 HCP range.
1♠-P-2♣-P
2♦-P-3NT 3NT shows extra
, A 2NT bid is an either or
hand . A minimum flat hand or the
18-19 HCP hand.
You
have a flat 15-17 HCP hand with a 4 card heart suit & partner opens 1♦ . A direct leap to 3NT
is a picture bid showing a 4-3-3-3 16 HCP ( you play
2NT as limit raise or better ). How do you show the flat hands with a 4 card
major in the 15-17 HCP range? 4th suit
forcing to the rescue . Bid a 4th
suit later & jump to 3NT . You did not bid 2NT
going in , so you probably have more HCP’s.
How
about the bigger hands in the 18-19 HCP range ? Bid 4th suit forcing or 2/1 &
leap to 4NT .
This is not Blackwood as you have to agree a fit first. If it is a minor fit , then a jump
in the minor is Blackwood anyway.
1♥-P-2♣-P
2♦-P-4NT
This is not
Blackwood with hearts or diamonds as the trump suit. You would have established a fit by
making a different bid earlier. This is simply telling partner I have a flat 18-19 HCP’s so bid accordingly.
If
you have a 4th suit forcing bid available & you do not use it , is there a
meaning for the 4NT jump ? Yes in a non fit auction
there is a meaning
1♣-P-1♦-P
1♥-P-4NT
You did not bid 4th suit
forcing or XYZ before you jumped to 4NT nor did you
confirm a fit before leaping to 4NT . This has to be quantitative as you probably have spades so
why bother mentioning them when partner shows 9 cards in clubs & hearts ( misfit auction ) ?
It can not be Blackwood as why are you so lazy
as to not show the heart fit thru XYZ first ? It should not be Blackwood on that basis even
in Rubber Bridge.
Sometimes
in a 2/1 auction or if opponents interfere with a 3
level pre-empt ,
you are too strong to bid 3NT. Since you
have not
established a fit , a leap to 4NT just means you are too strong to bid 3NT. Dora Lee & I
reached 7NT with one of these auctions. She opened 1♦ , they overcalled 3♠
so I felt I was too strong to bid 3NT , so I
bid 4NT. Dora had a huge hand so we landed in 7NT where I had 18 top tricks.
There is a law in Bridge
that 4NT is not Blackwood
unless there is a major suit fit
established with some rare minor suit
exceptions. This means established , not just
implied somehow. There should be no confusion with 4NT . The default for 4NT in non
fit auctions is quantitative , not Ace asking. 4NT in a misfit auction
when no fit has been suggested just means you are too strong to bid 3NT. Very important concept. When you
take away the strong jump shift by responder , you
need a way of quantitatively showing extra.
Bidding quite often a “forced 3NT” does not do that.
Perry
& I get to a nice 6♣ slam via the 4NT bid being too strong to bid 3NT
principle. Perry held ♠AJxx
♥Kx ♦xx ♣AKQJx a cool 18 HCP with a source of tricks in clubs. I
open 1♥ , Perry bid 2♣
followed by 2♦ by me & 2♠ by Perry. I bid 3♦ so Perry has a hand
where in the old days they would have made a strong jump shift in clubs . He cannot bid 3NT
as he has not yet advised partner that he has a source of
tricks & 18 HCP’s in controls with the key ♥K . Perry bids 4NT which must be quantitative as we are in an obvious misfit auction.
I have ♠x ♥AQ10xx ♦KQJxx ♣xx so I bid 5♣
over 4NT as a choice of contracts. Perry bids 6♣ & they are in 6NT at
the other table going down for a 17 IMP pickup.
Quantitative bidding quite
often is counting HCP
during the auction & bidding quantitatively. There is a rule
when holding a 5 card major after partner opens 1NT. If you have HCP’s scattered
around 6 or 7 , you can pass 1NT if you wish. You have 22 or 23 HCP so why
gamble that partner fits your anemic 5 card major suit fit ?
She may have a worthless doubleton , so you found the
only contract that can not make. What about if you have very few HCP’s ? This is desperation time as 1NT will probably go
down quite a few so you have nothing to lose
by transferring. Transferring also as a psychological effect on the opponents
as you have concealed your HCP’s or lack thereof from them. My partner held ♠xxx ♥Qxxxx ♦xxx ♣xx & passed my vul 1NT bid recently. The opponents balanced & played
in 2NT making 3 for –150. This translates to down 3 vul
for me , if they had not
balanced ! We opened up the
slip & the entire
field was in 2♥ making our way as
the transfer had indeed done the
psychological job.
Another hand which shows counting HCP’s during the auction ♠xx ♥Q1098x ♦A10x ♣xxx. Partner opens 2♣ so you bid 2♦. Partner bids 2NT & you transfer which partner super accepts. You bid 4♦ as a re-transfer but partner interprets it as a Q bid & bids KCB . Counting HCP’s with partners 24 HCP maximum & your 6 totaling 30 , you are well short of the HCP’s needed for 6NT ( 33 HCP the norm) . So you could pass 4NT , but you answer your Ace anyway. Partner now bids 5NT confirming to your unlimited hand that you have all the controls. You bid 6♥ & you get a top as 6♥ is cold. Of course , you can not bid 6NT as you know from bidding quantitatively you are well short of the required HCP’s for that contract.