Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:19 AM

Hand Evaluation - 4th suit forcing ( Replacement )

 

PITBULLS:

 

            4th suit forcing is a kluge . It was invented so that previous forcing bids could be considered as invitational only. In the early days of Bridge , a 2NT bid or a jump preference or a jump rebid or a secondary jump shift by responder were all forcing to game. Somebody decided that these jumps would be better used as invitational so a sometimes artificial 4th suit was invented to accommodate this. These artificial 4th suit forcing bids caused problems all of their own.

 

            One of the worst side effects of 4th suit forcing is that it added artificially to a natural bidding system . One of the strengths ( only strength ?) of standard bidding is that it is natural . When you bid a suit you have it so it shows where you live. You are allowed to “pattern out” to show a singleton in the 4th suit. You right side NT contracts by bidding NT from the correct side. 4th suit forcing destroys this natural bidding. The 4th suit may not be a suit at all. You hide your real distribution & quite often wrong side the NT contract. Your strength & especially your distribution is concealed , so you distort your hand. You distort strong hands to have invitational hands . This is the trade off.

 

            Take this hand for example ,AQx KJxx KxxxJx  , partner opens 1 so you respond a heart. Partner bids 2♣ so the standard bid is now to bid 2 . Partner is ♠xx xx AQxxxAKxx so now what ? You force her into a corner so she bids 3 giving the impression that she is 6-4 . Over 3 you have a decision to make. Do you support diamonds or bid 3NT ? If partner was 6-4 you have made a terrible mistake by bidding 3NT. If she has the hand above , you have made a terrible mistake bypassing 3NT . Many 6-4 hands could result in a baby diamond slam or even a grand slam  Kxx void A10xxxx ♣AK10x There are many many awkward 4 th suit auctions from my experience. Some players just leap to 3NT with the hand above & give up exploring for slam or the best game contract.

 

            There are two ways to combat bad 4th suit forcing auctions along with  the leaping to 3NT that pre-empts partner disease. The best way to reduce artificial 4th suit forcing is have 2NT by responder as a “new suit” & a one round force. Partner opens 1 , you respond 1. Partner rebids 2 , you hold ♠Axxx Kx QxxxKJx so you bid 2NT forcing . Partner bids 3♣ which “patterns out” her hand while showing extra. ♠x Axxxx AKxxAxx so you get to +1370 in diamonds . Try getting there after a leap to 3NT or a silly 4th suit forcing auction. Opener can escape from 2NT to a partial by rebidding her suit. Otherwise , we can get to some Meckwell 3NT contracts.  Rather simple.

 

            The 2nd way to combat bad 4th suit auctions is to play 2 way NMF at the one level ( XYZ ) . This parallels the exact NMF treatment that we play after a 1NT rebid. You can not make 3 bids at the one level without opening a minor first. Therefore playing 2 way NMF after all one level auctions makes a lot of sense. It rids the system entirely of artificial 4th suit forcing bids other than the 2 bid. This structure is triggered by 3 bids at the one level ( XYZ ) .

 

            Playing the above two understandings  , leaves the best of both worlds. You still have the invitational sequences but now 4th suit forcing to game is a natural bid. Patterning out becomes very common so your bidding accuracy improves. Removing or reducing artificial 4th suit forcing auctions from your system is a nice enhancement to an established partnership.