Sunday, May 18, 2003 5:47 PM
Hand Evaluation – Thrump Doubles
PITBULLS:
When opponents pre-empt , their main purpose is to screw up your auction. Stated differently ,
they want you out of 3NT . Thrump doubles are a great counter measure. Another sinister purpose of their pre-empting
is to jam you so you cannot find your 4-4 major fit .
The classic negative double was
invented to counter act that strategy. I feel you can use the negative double at the 3 level
with both types of hands . The classic negative double &
the hand that Marty Bergen describes below. This treatment just demands
that opener assumes
a Thrump double first so bids 3NT with a stopper
rather than a 4 card major. If she has no stopper , she just
bids naturally which could mean bidding her 4 card major . Without Thrump
doubles included in your 3 level negative double structure ,
a minor bid by the doubler would be a Q bid with an
implied major suit fit suggesting a slam . With Thrump
doubles , the minor is natural as our attempt to play
3NT failed , so we are bailing to our long minor. Giving up implied Q bids is a
small price to pay to get to 3NT.
A
direct Q bid is always a fit for
partners suit . Thrump doubles do not change that understanding. With Thrump doubles the worst thing that can happen is that you
miss your 4-4 major fit & play 3NT when you have
the stopper. Is that so bad in IMPS ? With 7 card
suits lurking , trump quite often break badly so 3NT
is the preferred contract anyway . It is also very hard to get ruffs in 3NT .
When playing a treatment , frequency of occurrence of the hands is an issue
for the partnership .The classic negative double is not lost playing Thrump doubles . Partner just has to be aware that the
double could be a Thrump
double . The type of hands Marty Bergen brings up below are
frequent and impossible to bid when the opponents pre-empt at the 3 level . His double only applies at the 3
level ( ♥ ♦ ♠
) and negative doubles still are on thru 4♦ or
whatever level you play them . There is just an additional meaning at
the 3 level and you are
required to bid 3NT with a stopper. Bergen should have used the classic negative
double in his examples as well ..
A |
A |
x |
x |
K |
K |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
Partner assumes a Trump
double initially so bids 3NT when you make a negative double with this hand at
the 3 level. . There is no guarantee that 4 of a major is a better or safer
contract with pre-emptive auctions . Quite often the
pre-empter does not have an entry and the more
frequent 4-1 major suit breaks can be handled in 3NT.
Below a review of the Thrump double
concept directly from Marty Bergen
:
“Thrump
doubles,” as described here, were invented by yours truly. While they certainly
are different, experience has shown that they
are essential at the three level.
What is a thrump
double and why do we need them? The discussion of the bidding on this hand will clue you in.
ª Q7 © Q2 ¨ 1087 § AKQJ75
Once your partner has opened
the bidding, you are thinking about 3NT. In fact, I will bet that is the case
regardless of which suit your partner opened. You will show your clubs and
points and hope partner bids notrump sooner or later.
Nice plan. Now suppose that
your RHO jumps to 3¨, 3© or 3ª before you are
able to make your first bid. Are you going to give up on the 3NT contract you were
heading for? If you make the “normal” 4§ bid, do you expect partner to provide the five tricks you will need to
bring home 5§?
What is my suggestion? Make a
negative double. However, instead of defining it as just looking for the unbid major(s), think of it as
looking for THRee notrUMP
also. On most hands where partner has a stopper in the opponent’s
suit, you would like him to bid 3NT.
When is this needed? When the
enemy’s natural jump overcall reaches 3¨, we cannot necessarily show our suit without going past 3NT. Here are
the 10 auctions where the opponent has made a natural, preemptive jump overcall
above 3§ and below 3NT.
1§ - (3¨) 1§ - (3©) 1§ - (3ª)
1¨ - (3¨) 1¨ - (3©) 1¨ - (3ª)
1© - (3¨) 1ª - (3©) 1© - (3ª)
1ª - (3¨)
Must you have a solid suit? Absolutely not. A thrump double
would be totally appropriate after 1© - (3ª) with:
ª 864 © 65 ¨ AQ754 § AQ2 or
ª 93 © K7 ¨ KQ10865 § KQ8 or
ª 63 © A2 ¨ 852 § AK10854
Now you are responder after 1§ - (3©).
ª K3 © 84 ¨ AKQJ5 § J753
(Double, hoping partner bids
3NT.)
ª KQ863 © KQ2 ¨ K7 § 985
(Forget your spades. You have hearts stopped so bid 3NT.)
ª AK © A64 ¨ AK83 § J852
(Once in a
blue moon you will have a great hand with a stopper in the opponent’s suit. In
that case, you can start with a negative double and then explore for slam.)
Applies when the
jump overcall is 3¨, 3© or 3ª.
Tells opener to bid 3NT
when he has a stopper in the opponent’s suit.
Says nothing specific about responder’s
holding in the unbid suits.
Almost always denies a stopper in the
opponent’s suit.
Responder denies a five-card major that he
could have bid at the three level.
Promises at least 10 HCP and denies
three-card support for opener’s major.
Worth noting: responder could have a very long minor.