Saturday, September 07, 2002
11:26 PM
KCB - Agreed Suit
PITBULLS:
One of the basics of KCB is that there must be an
“agreed” suit when partner leaps to 4NT . Kantar discusses this : The
rule is that if there is room in a forcing auction
to support partner and that does not
happen , 4NT is quantitative or in rare cases
standard Blackwood.
If the opponents pre-empt
you and there is no room
, the last suit bid is agreed for
KCB. If partner in a minor suit auction
had a chance to support and did not
, a jump to 4NT is quantitative.
Do not be lazy. Support partner
to clarify the situation !!
The
opponents were a pest in this auction. I held KQxx
x AJ10987x K and BJ Trelford opened 1♣ and I responded 1♦. They bid 2♥ and BJ bid 2♠ and RHO bid 3♥ . The opponents are pre-empting you in this auction by taking away bidding room.
The last suit bid by BJ is the
agreed suit for KCB purposes. I take control by bidding 4NT and we get to a
cold grand slam via KCB & a suit asking bid in diamonds.
Kantar discusses 2♣ auctions where the 2♣ bidder has agreed suit KCB
rights by virtue of the nature of the beast.
THE AGREED SUIT
If there is one area where partnership agreement is a must, it is having simple
rules to determine the agreed suit when there has been no agreed
suit! Much depends upon system. Two over
one game forcing? Most expert partnerships have their own rules- and they are
not all the same! I am not on firm ground here, but I will offer
several debatable suggestions.
Opener
Responder
1S
4NT
?
Is spades the agreed suit because it was the last (only) bid
suit? Many players would say yes. Not
me. Any experienced partnership must have a forcing raise.
Therefore, when responder wishes to ask for
keycards in partner's opening major suit bid, he makes a forcing raise and then
bids 4NT. This, in turn, liberates a direct jump to 4NT to be
ace asking with no agreed suit. The way we used to play.
If responder picks up: S. x H.
KQx D. AKQJxxx C. KQ he
can leap to 4NT directly and get a simple ace answering response.
What about this sequence?
Opener
Responder
1S
2D
2S
4NT
?
Does this agree spades? If you play 2 over 1 as a game force,
you can bid 3S to agree spades and then 4NT. Playing 2
over 1, 4NT in this sequence should NOT agree spades. It should probably agree
diamonds. Not everyone would agree with this
Here's another one:
Opener
Responder
1S
2D
2H
4NT?
Is hearts the agreed suit? Playing two over one, why didn't
responder agree hearts first by raising to 3H and then bid
4NT? Playing 2 over 1 this should not be RKB for hearts.
What about after a strong 2C opening followed by natural, not control showing,
responses?
(a)
Opener
Responder
2C
2S
3H
3S
4NT
?
(b)
Opener
Responder
2C
3C
3H
3S
4NT
?
(c)
Opener
Responder
2C
2D
2H
2S
3H
3S
4NT
?
Is hearts or spades the agreed suit?
Consider the first sequence where responder has bid and rebid spades.
You might try this:
If the 2C opener bids a suit once and
the responder bids and rebids a suit, responder's suit is the agreed suit.
If the 2C opener bids one suit and the responder bids two different suits the
2C bidder's suit is still the agreed suit.
If the 2C opener
bids and rebids the same suit, that is the agreed suit period.
If opener has: Axx
AKQxxx AKQ
x he would like spades to be considered the agreed
suit. But if opener has: x AKJ10xxx
AKQx A he would like hearts to
be the considered agreed suit.
Also, you must be prepared to handle 4NT after they have laid a preempt on you.
South
West
North East
1H
3C
3D Pass
3S
Pass 4NT(?)
Is this for spades, hearts, diamonds, no agreed suit, or natural (may have too much
to rebid 3NT?)
The rule when there is no room
to establish a fit before game is reached , the last suit is the agreed suit
. In this auction 4H/S would end the auction so 4NT agrees spades . A 4♣ Q bid
would agree hearts and then 4NT is clearly for hearts .