Monday, June 06, 2005 8:06 PM
Lackwood
PITBULLS:
KCB
is a sophisticated system so playing Italian style Q bids, slams reached by the way of 5 level Q
bids are out of the question. 5 level Q bidding is a no-no playing Italian Q
bids as you do not know whether there is 1st or 2nd round
controls being bid previously. There is no such thing as Q bidding at the 5
level playing this style. If Q bidding starts at the 5 level it should be Exclusion
Blackwood . What if you are Q bidding and you go on to the 5 level in your own trump suit bypassing KCB ? There
obviously must be some flaw that prevented you from using KCB . Voila you must
have a suit that lacks a 1st or 2nd round control and you
can not use KCB or you have bid
the ambiguous Last Train Slam Try . This type of Last Train Q bid may or may
not have a control in the suit bid..
The
creative minds of Meckwell defined a use
for the jump to 5 of your major . They called it Lackwood. ( lacking a control
Blackwood ) . When you are Q
bidding and you bid 5 of your agreed trump suit it normally asks if you have control of
the unbid suit bid 6 . Lackwood builds on that concept. When you bid 5 of the
agreed suit you do not have control in this unbid suit. However , it is more
than the standard treatment . You do pass
if you also do not control that suit but respond controls if you do. These are
straight KCB responses. You bid 6 of the trump suit if you just have 2nd
round control of that suit. For grand slam exploration , if you have 1st
round control , you bid KCB responses. 1st step is 1 or 4 , 2nd step 0 or 3 , 3rd
2 without and 4th step two with the queen of trump.
When
you play “last train” slam tries you “Q bid” a suit that you do not have or may not have a
control in ( one under the trump suit) saying that you have a control elsewhere but
due the rank nature
of Q bidding you can not show it without passing game. Remember that the “last
train” Q bid still may
have a control in that suit but this Q bid does not necessarily
show it. The last train bid is showing a Q bid that has been previously
unbiddable. The fact that you may have a Q bid in your “last train” suit brings in
Lackwood. You bid 5 of the major asking for the control in that suit that you Q
bid as a “last train” slam try !!
Some
sample auctions 1♠-P-2♦-P
4♥ is the last train slam try showing a club control
but not
2♠-P-3♠-P necessarily
a heart control. 5♠
is “Lackwood” asking for the
3NT-P-4♦-P heart
control.
4♥-P-5♠-P
1♥-P-2♦-P
4♦ is the last train slam try showing a spade control (
since
2♥-P-3♥-P partner
denied a spade control with 3NT) 4NT
3NT-P-4♦-P
instead of Lackwood as 1st round control in spades not
4NT
shown.
In
“last train” auctions , Lackwood is always predicated on the “Last Train” suit
. If you are sure of the 1st
round controls bid Lackwood otherwise KCB is in order. Some more examples
Last
Train Q bid sometimes shows a Q bid that is unbiddable and sometimes tells
partner that a control is missing but I am still interested in slam. This
auction shows that a control is missing .
1♠-P-2♥-P
Partner obviously has no diamond
control. If you have 1st round
2♠-P-3♠-P diamond & club control , you can
bid Lackwood in hearts
3NT-P-4♣-P With 2Nd round diamond
control bid KCB or signoff with none.
4♥-P-?
Last Train Q bid and Lackwood go together.
Partner uses the Last Train Q bid to show 1) I have a specific control that you
denied but I can not show it without going beyond game 2) Please tell me if you
have the specific control that we are missing by taking control with KCB or
Lackwood 3) I want you to use your judgment as I have extra 4) some combination
of the above.
Try
this auction 1♥-P-2♦-P
You did not make a serious 3NT bid and you do not have a spade or
2♥-P-3♥-P club
control. Meckwell plays this as a subtle Last Train saying that
4♦
I am still
interested and I might have a
diamond control. The suit
below the trump suit is always Last Train no matter how the
auction went. This must be hearts with spades agreed and diamonds if hearts
agreed , of course. They say it works !!