Monday, November 14, 2005 7:02 AM
Lead Directing Doubles - Invites
PITBULLS:
Invitational auctions and penalty doubles go hand in hand . From my rubber Bridge
experience , I have made most of my rubber Bridge money doubling these
“stretches” when the cards are lying unfavourably for them . Zia in his book
“Bridge my way” gives countless examples of psychological doubles on these invitational auctions. He gives examples
where on the bidding where they have stumbled into an excellent Moysean and he
knew the trump were breaking 3-3
for them . So what does he do , he doubles to get them back into their minor
which breaks badly and they go for a number . Unlucky !
An
“ear to the bidding” is a common
theme for lead directing doubles
also. On invitational auctions , they do not have much extra so you should
always be on the look out for a lead directing double. Lead directing
doubles are one aspect of the game of Bridge that shows the difference between
IMPS players and match point players.
Match point players do not make lead
directing doubles very often. If the opponents make their doubled
contract , it is a cold zero. IMPS
or rubber Bridge players make many more lead directing doubles as the punishment nowhere meets the crime. You
lose 4 IMPS when they make their doubled contract. When you beat the doubled
contract , the pay off is huge as you win 12 IMPS possibly more. This means you
only have to be successful one time in 3 to break even in IMPS or rubber Bridge
!
When
the auction is invitational , Rubber Bridge players or IMPs savy opponents are like vultures circling . If the opportunity
presents itself even marginally they pounce on invitational auctions. Every Bridge play knows how important opening
leads are in contracts where there is nothing to spare. Susan Culham had an
opportunity for a huge swing by making a lead directing double on an
invitational auction. Axx xxx KJ9x Axx and the vul opponents open 1♣ and
respond 1♦. The opener rebids 1♥ and the responder makes an invitational bid of 3♣ .
They now bid 3NT so what do you do ? This is a clear lead directing double for
a diamond lead. You know that the
diamonds might be unfavourably located for them and it was an invitational auction. They are prepared for
partners probable spade lead so time to pounce. You double and partner leads
his 4th best diamond.
The board hits with xxx
K Q10xx KJxxx and declarer plays small . Using the rule of 11 there
is only one higher than partners spot card so it must be the Ace. The stiff Ace
wins and declarer attacks clubs you win the club ace and come back a high spade
to discourage the spade return. Partner leads a high diamond spot and if
declarer errs by not covering you can win 3 diamond tricks. This along with
your spade AK and the club ace is +500. At the other table your teammates
decided to treat a stiff king and 3-1 in the majors as a deterrent and showed
his bad hand & +5 card support for partner by making a tactical 3♣ bid.
This made for +130 and coupled with +500 you win 13 IMPS. By not doubling this
close contract , they made +630 with the obvious spade lead and you lost 12
IMPS. The stakes are huge in these
situations. This hand was a 24 IMP swing. Gambling losing –4 for them making
3NTX pales in comparison to with what you may be rewarded.