Sunday, February 08, 2004 9:49 PM
Multi 2D
PITBULLS:
Most
of the top world class pairs whose convention cards I analyzed play some sort
of disruptive weak 2 structure. In order to play these bids they need a multi 2
♦ opener. Here is a rather standard multi 2♦ structure :
A Multi 2D opening bid
shows one of the following hand types:
Responder's available
bids are:
2H |
Weak hand, does not
promise heart heart support. Opener can rebid 2S should he hold hand type 2).
Pass or convert is the message for this bid. |
2S |
Inviting game in
hearts if that is opener's suit, but signoff if opener's suit is spades. Opener
can rebid 3H (signoff), 4H (signoff), or Pass with spades. |
2NT |
Strong and artificial
(see below). |
3C |
7+ clubs, signoff. |
3D |
7+ diamonds, signoff. |
3H |
Hand inviting game in
spades, if that is opener's suit. Opener can rebid 3S (signoff), 4S
(signoff), or Pass with hearts. |
4C |
Strong clubs with
support for both majors. |
4D |
Strong diamonds with support for both majors.Opener's responses to
the artificial 2NT query are: |
3C |
Weak two-bid in
hearts, good hand. |
3D |
Weak two-bid in
spades, good hand. |
3H |
Weak two-bid in
hearts, bad hand. |
3S |
Weak two-bid in
spades, bad hand. |
3NT |
Strong three-suited
hand (17-24 HCP) with a singleton club. |
4C |
Strong three-suited
hand (17-24 HCP) with a singleton diamond. |
4D |
Strong three-suited
hand (17-24 HCP) with a singleton heart. |
4H |
Strong three-suited
hand (17-24 HCP) with a singleton spade. |
If responder
makes an original signoff bid,
any strange-sounding rebid by opener shows the strong three-suited hand. The
partnerships should discuss this i.e. does the bid show the stiff etc
A paradox bid is a
non-forcing call of the suit you don't hold
when length in one of two suits has been shown or implied by partner's bid,
generally when the partnership expects to subside in one of these suits.
Tricks opposite the
Multi 2 diamonds
|
|||||
I claim no originality for ParadoX advances which are an
intrinsic part of the Multi. But even here partnerships tend to underuse the
method. Let's start with "standard" responses Partner opens Multi 2♦ showing a weak two in either major (commonly) or various stong
hands (rarely)
However ParadoX allows similar bids at the
three level - extending the preempt
It would be nice to play similar ParadoX
preempt extentions at the four level, but my view and experience is that this
does not work. There will always be hands where you simply want to simply bid game in your own major when partner
pre-empts. 4♥ and 4♠ should be natural responses. |