Friday, September 26, 2003 12:38 AM

Negative Double Theory

 

PITBULLS:

 

            Two hands that came up on Thurs nite IMPS which emphasizes negative double theory . Negative doubles were invented to describe hands that can not be bid naturally . In other words , if you have a natural bid that make it rather then muddy the waters with a double.

 

A

Q

A

x

x

10

K

 

x

x

10

 

x

 

9

 

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

 

       Partner opens 1 and RHO bids 3♣ . Should you make a negative double  as you  have both unbid suits and your 4-4 spade fit might play better ? No ,  because you  have a natural 3 bid to “show where you live” in an auction where the opponents  might be sacrificing . A 4♣ bid would show the heart fit but partner with her  possible diamond fit might be poorly placed to make a decision. So you bid 3 and LHO passes and partner bids 3 . You now Q bid 4♣ to show you heart fit and club control and LHO bids 5♣ .  Now forcing pass theory comes into play .

 

 

K

K

J

K

J

J

x

 

10

9

 

 

x

8

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

      The opponents have given you a chance to describe your “dog” . You thank them and gratefully double . Hearts are 2-2 so you get 2 spades and a heart and a diamond for +300 and 5 heart goes down on a diamond ruff.

 

 

            Re-opening doubles are an important part of negative double theory. You should bend over backwards to re-open with a double but with a caveat that you “play the vulnerability” . My partner held

 

 

J

J

A

A

x

 

Q

K

 

 

J

x

 

 

10

x

 

 

x

x

 

 

 

 

     Vul , you open 1 and a 2 weak jump overcall and all pass around to you . There Is a strong chance that partner has a penalty double of 2 . Do you want to give her a  chance to convert on this vulnerability ? Partner could have long clubs with hearts and  thinks that since you have spades and diamonds its best to go for the penalty. You might be cold for 6 clubs vul . If the vulnerability were equal or reversed I would always double with this hand . Vul against not though I bid 3♣ not letting partner convert for penalty. Turns out that 2 X goes for –300 and 6♣ makes without a spade lead. Doubling with this hand may also rescue them to a spade sacrifice if the auction gains some momentum towards a club contract.

 

Another hand along the same theme. You hold x xx AQx AKxxxxx and with everyone vul you open 1♣. LHO overcalls 1 and around to you again. You can smell a spade penalty conversion a mile away so do you double ?  No , you have a good offensive so bid 2♣. Why not 3♣ ? partner knows you have a good offensive hand or else you would have doubled with a bad defensive hand. Keeping the level low pays unexpected dividends as LHO backs in 2 and a resounding double by partner. +1100 for your side.