Thursday,
July 20, 2006 4:13 PM
Partnership Bridge
PITBULLS:
Bridge
is a partnership game . This concept prevents single handed poker decisions which in
Bridge is a recipe for disaster.
One of the best concepts to re-enforce partnership Bridge is forcing pass theory. When you own the
auction , forcing pass theory is the basis for joint partnership decisions. In order to play forcing pass
theory , you need to recognize the cues that determine that you own the
auction.
Here
is a hand from Chicago where forcing pass theory assists in making the right
decision. The opponents open 1♠
and Maurice vul overcalled 2♥ and
Susan held A9xxxx xxx xx QJ and
raised to 3♥.
Here LHO bid 4♦
and Maurice bid a vulnerable 4♥
game. RHO bid 5♦
so what is your bid and why ? By Maurice bidding a vulnerable game , he has
stated that our side owns this auction
so forcing pass theory kicks in. A double in forcing pass theory is a red light warning
partner not to bid again because I am minimum or I have length/duplication in
their suit. Susan doubles to turn on the red light and the optimum result is
achieved.
The
other day Tom & I had an example of forcing pass theory in action but a
different auction triggered forcing pass theory. Tom opened 1♣ and they
overcalled 1♥ and I bid 2♥ which shows a limit raise or better in
clubs. In forcing pass theory “limit raise or better” does not turn on forcing
pass theory until your side bids game
. Tom leapt to 5♣ and they bid 5♦
so what should I do with my hand and why ♠A ♥A987x ♦xxx ♣KQJx ?
I have a pretty good hand on the auction but in accordance with forcing
pass theory , I must make a warning double
saying I have quick losers in diamonds. This is a red light for partner not to
bid 6. I double and LHO gives preference to 5♥ and Tom passes around to me and I double.
Best defense gets 5♥X
for 1100 against our 5♣ for +400. Maurice added some comments on this hand on
what the opponents did not do at the two
level. Although they gave preference at the 5 level , they never doubled 2♥ or competed to 3♥. This should imply that partner has the
“better” rather than the limit raise hand for the Q bid. This again would
re-enforce that we own the hand at the 5 level.