Wednesday,
November 15, 2006 10:51 AM
Playing The Vulnerability - Toys
PITBULLS:
Playing
the vulnerability is an important strategy/tactic in Bridge. Noticing the vulnerability should as
standard as sorting your cards & counting your HCP’s. The next step is to
realize that your bids change their meaning depending on the vulnerability. There is
what I call the terrorist vulnerability ( nv vrs vul ) where even non
advocates of modern bidding can bid like the modern bidders ! Partner is trained
to put on her catchers mitt & give partner
leeway on this one vulnerability. On all other vulnerability
scenarios , your bids must be disciplined
as partner is going to take them to the bank.
The
opponents open a strong NT . Using your toys are very vulnerability dependent.
If they are vulnerable , you tend to double
with all good hands. When the vulnerability is reversed ( you vul – them not)
you tend to use your toy because getting to your vul game is more important
then a NV set. If you are on the terrorist vulnerability , by all means attempt
to blow up their auctions.
What
about jumps to the 3 level in a major
after a 1NT opening bid ? These again are vulnerability dependent. On all
vulnerabilities other than the terrorist vulnerability , a jump to the 3 level
is a good distributional hand
saying partner bid 4 with any excuse. On the terrorist vulnerability , I prefer
a jump to the 3 level in a major to be pre-emptive.
I jump to 4♥/♠ with those good
distributional hands with that one vulnerability.
What
about jumps to the 3 level in a minor ? Most Bridge experts have a systemic
meaning for a 2♣/♦
overcall so with 3 out of the 4 vulnerabilities things just shows hands that
you would have overcalled at the two level . With the terrorist vulnerability ,
these bids can be shaded to border on the pre-emptive range of hands. A jump to
the 3 level in a minor is never strong though , or you would have preferred to double going in.
I
was mentoring Monday night &
my partner held ♠Qx
♥AKQ109x
♦void
♣KQJxx , it went a strong NT to his right. They were vul & we were not so
what do you bid ? My partner attempted to slot this hand into our system (
Standard Dictator) so he overcalled 2♣ showing clubs & another suit. I
passed as I had 4♣ & nothing else however the strong NT stepped out with 2♠. My partner now made up
lost time with a 4♥
bid. I gave preference to 5♣ which got doubled & mis-defended for +550 our
way. Not the recommended way to bid this hand.
What
is the correct way to bid these hand types ? If clubs & hearts were
reversed , I would bid 2NT which shows any
strong two suiter. However , in this case, my six
card major is so strong , I would bid 3♥ on 3 vulnerabilites & 4♥ with the remaining one. Partner will bump
you to game with any excuse on the 3 disciplined vulnerabilities & you are
in 4♥
on the terrorist vulnerability.
Do
not just automatically slot your two suited hands into your conventional toy. Notice the
vulnerability & the length of your major. If they are vul , double them
with your powerful hand . If this gets passed out , they are in serious trouble. If you can not stand to have
partner pass your systemic toy , do not use the bid. Jump to 3 of a major or
just take control and bid game yourself.